Language selection

Search

About federal marine conservation tools

On this page

Overview

Canada’s oceans are home to many different marine ecosystems, habitats and species. The biological diversity (or biodiversity) of these resources:

Biodiversity

Biodiversity is the variability among living organisms from all sources, including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems.
Source: Convention on Biological Diversity, Article 2. Use of Terms, 1992

Ensuring that these environmental, social, cultural and economic benefits remain available to future generations is a priority for the Government of Canada.

To meet this priority, Canada identifies marine areas for conservation. We safeguard biodiversity for present and future generations. We reduce stresses from human activities by ensuring that conservation takes precedence over human use. These marine areas also provide opportunities for people to connect with nature.

Areas of the oceanFootnote 1 set aside for conservation include:

Marine protected area or MPA is a broad and generic term. In Canada, federal MPAs are established using a variety of distinct protection tools:

Other effective area-based conservation measure (OECM) is a term used for area-based measures other than MPAs that provide long-term biodiversity outcomes.

Three federal departments (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada and Parks Canada) work with Indigenous Peoples, stakeholders, partners and local communities to:

Human activities are managed to protect and conserve the ecosystems, habitats or species in these areas.

Marine conservation and reconciliation

The Government of Canada is committed to advancing reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples through a renewed nation-to-nation, government-to-government and Inuit-Crown relationship based on recognition of rights, respect, cooperation and partnership as the foundation for transformative change.

The Government of Canada acknowledges and respects the inherent rights of Indigenous governments over harvesting and land use, according to treaties and self-governing agreements. The government further intends that marine conservation advance reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in a manner consistent with the specific obligations within the United Nations (UN) Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, UN Declaration Act (PDF, 151 KB). In this way, marine conservation may provide opportunities for meeting Indigenous objectives and aspirations and respect areas that have spiritual, cultural or historical importance.

Consultation and engagement with Indigenous governments and communities is an important part of establishing a marine protected area. Indigenous knowledge is woven together with western science and other forms of information to create a complete picture of the area to be protected. Opportunities are available for collaborative governance and co-management that work to support Indigenous leadership in conservation.

All marine conservation tools offer collaborative possibilities. Federal departments or agencies can partner with Indigenous governments in the governance of protected and conserved areas to support vulnerable ecosystems and the conservation of culturally important areas and resources, and in collaboration with Indigenous communities in the management of these areas.

Partnering on IPCAs

The Government of Canada recognizes the importance of Indigenous-led conservation, including marine Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs), and is committed to working with Indigenous partners to advance shared conservation goals. Working together from an early stage to explore how conserved sites may be dually designated (under federal and Indigenous establishment mechanisms) ensures an inclusive approach that reflects a shared commitment to protect the area. The Government of Canada is committed to open dialogue and consultation with all parties and stakeholders when contemplating new conservation initiatives, including new marine IPCA partnership opportunities.  

Tools

At present, the Government of Canada uses 4 main federal conservation tools to ensure that marine ecosystems, habitats and species are protected effectively. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada and Parks Canada use their own laws to establish protected and conserved areas:

Infographic : How do we protect our oceans?

How do we protect our oceans?

  1. Oceans Act MPAs, established by Fisheries and Oceans Canada, protect and conserve:

Learn more about Oceans Act MPAs.

  1. National Marine Conservation Areas and National Marine Conservation Area Reserves are established by Parks Canada under the Canada National Marine Conservation Act to protect and conserve representative marine areas in the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic oceans and the Great Lakes for the benefit, education and enjoyment of people in Canada and around the world. These areas have 8 interconnected, mutually reinforcing management goals:
    1. protect marine ecosystems and biodiversity (of primary importance)
    2. conserve cultural heritage
    3. manage use in an ecologically sustainable manner
    4. support Indigenous leadership in marine conservation
    5. contribute to the well-being of Indigenous Peoples and coastal communities
    6. facilitate opportunity for meaningful visitor experience
    7. enhance awareness and understanding of NMCAs
    8. advance effective collaboration for management

Learn more about National Marine Conservation Areas.

  1. Marine National Wildlife Areas and National Wildlife Areas with marine components are established by Environment and Climate Change Canada under the Canada Wildlife Act.

Learn more about National Widlife Areas and marine National Wildlife Areas.

  1. Marine refuges are fisheries-area closures established by Fisheries and Oceans Canada under the Fisheries Act. These areas meet the Government of Canada’s Guidance for Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs):

Learn more about marine refuges

Biodiversity conservation benefit

A biodiversity conservation benefit or BCB is the net positive change in biodiversity or prevention of its loss, resulting from the governance decisions and management actions within an area. (OECM Guidance 2022)

Marine Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs) are 2 main categories of area-based measures Canada uses to protect and conserve ocean ecosystems:

  1. MPAs are parts of the ocean that are legally protected and managed to achieve the long-term conservation of nature. MPAs may allow some current and future activities depending on their impacts to the species, habitat or ecological features being protected. In Canada, MPAs are established under various statutes, each of which has its purpose for protecting an area.
  2. Marine OECMs are geographically defined areas (other than MPAs) which are:

Source: Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2018 (PDF, 693 KB)

To date, the only type of marine OECM that has been recognized in Canada is a marine refuge. A marine refuge is a fisheries-area closure established under the Fisheries Act that meets the Government of Canada’s marine OECM criteria developed in 2022, following the CBD definition (above) and 2016 CSAS science advice.

Working together, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Parks Canada continue to conserve Canada’s marine and coastal territory as either MPAs or OECMs.

Differences between MPAs and OECMs

MPAs and OECMs are similar in that they are both area-based measures and both contribute to biodiversity conservation by prohibiting, or otherwise managing, human activities. However, there are 3 important differences:

  1. The prohibitions, authorized activities and/or management actions specified for an MPA are based on its stated conservation objectives (what the MPA is designed to conserve). By contrast, a candidate OECM may be established for a variety of reasons, some of which may not be directly related to conservation. When the area is managed in ways that provide biodiversity conservation benefits over the long term, it may be recognized as an OECM.
  2. Federal MPAs can be established under the authority of different federal statutes (i.e. Canada National Marine Conservation Act, Oceans Act and Canada Wildlife Act) and designated and managed through regulations or schedules. By contrast, an OECM is a policy and science-based recognition granted to an area-based measure that meets the criteria outlined in the Government of Canada’s 2022 marine OECM guidance.

Area-based measure

An area-based measure is any spatially defined measure implemented to achieve one or more objectives. For example, a fisheries-area closure established under the Fisheries Act is an area-based measure that can be recognized as an OECM if it meets the marine OECM guidance criteria.

  1. The government plans to implement the MPA Protection Standard in most Footnote 2 federal MPAs established after April 2019, by prohibiting the following industrial activities:
    • oil and gas exploration, development and production
    • mineral exploration and exploitation
    • disposal-at-sea of waste and other matter
    • dumping of fill
    • deposit of deleterious drugs and pesticides
    • bottom-trawl gear

As part of the MPA Protection Standard, Transport Canada is developing regulatory proposals to enhance restrictions on certain vessel discharges in MPAs.

The Federal Marine Protected Area (MPA) Protection Standard

The MPA Protection Standard provides greater consistency and clarity on certain activities that the Government plans to prohibit in most new federal MPAs. These concrete and predictable measures are part of a balanced approach that will provide high levels of environmental protection.

The government’s marine OECM Protection Standard offers more flexibility for marine refuges by requiring that all activities be assessed on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the risks they pose to the area’s biodiversity conservation benefits are effectively avoided or mitigated.

More about MPAs

Oceans Act MPAs

Oceans Act MPAs are established by Fisheries and Oceans Canada for the conservation of marine ecosystems, habitats and species:

National Marine Conservation Areas

National Wildlife Areas and marine National Wildlife Areas 

More about OECMs

Creating a national conservation network

The effectiveness of each individual MPA or OECM is enhanced when a collection of conserved areas works cooperatively in a network to safeguard important ecological components of the ocean and support marine biodiversity as a whole. As described in the 2011 National Framework for Canada’s Network of Marine Protected Areas, the geographic scope of Canada’s network of marine protected areas and other conserved areas covers tidal waters of the Canadian portion of the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific oceans from the high-water mark outward to the edge of the Exclusive Economic Zone, as well as the Great Lakes and any wetlands associated with those areas.

While this webpage is focused on providing information on the 4 main tools of federal marine conservation, it is important to note that there are other tools that can also be used to protect aquatic areas. Marine portions of Canada’s National Parks and National Historic Sites can contribute to conservation, as can marine portions of Migratory Bird Sanctuaries. Coastal areas protected by provinces and territories under their own laws can also deliver conservation outcomes.

An interactive map shows all the marine areas in Canada that have been protected and conserved by all available tools.

Engagement and consultation

Reflecting interests of governments, Indigenous Peoples, stakeholders and the general public in an MPA’s design and management increases awareness and understanding and supports conservation and the MPA’s objectives.

All MPA programs include a variety of public consultation and engagement opportunities in their establishment and management processes. For example:

Indigenous Peoples and coastal communities, affected fish harvesters and other stakeholders are consulted before fisheries-area closures are put in place, including if closures are intended to be recognized as OECMs and be in place as marine refuges for the long term.

How these tools are used

Canada’s marine conservation tools are designed to provide strong protections for ecosystems, habitats and species, while allowing flexibility for economic activities where they do not jeopardize achievement of conservation goals and objectives.

A number of considerations can go into deciding which conservation tool to use, including:

The following examples indicate how these considerations could work in making decisions about first, whether the area should be established as an MPA or recognized as an OECM, and second, if an MPA is needed, which specific marine conservation tool would be most appropriate. Note that these are fictional examples designed to illustrate the processes through which decisions on tools may be made. In many cases, answering the questions above will help to determine which tool(s) may offer the best protection (as in examples 1-6). However, there is no precise formula that can be applied to select tools, because each site is unique.

Example 1

An area of bubblegum coral is discovered in the ocean. The area needs protection because the coral structures provide important habitat for many species. The primary threat to the coral is from bottom-contact fishing.

A single threat to what needs to be protected would likely signal the use of a targeted area-based measure, such as a fisheries-area closure. Once the closure is legally established (using authorities under the Fisheries Act), the biodiversity conservation benefits provided by the closure can be assessed according to the OECM Guidance and the area can be recognized. Fisheries- area closures that meet the OECM criteria are known as marine refuges.

Example 2

A large and biologically productive area in the offshore Atlantic Ocean with a variety of ecological features that provide feeding and nursery grounds for a number of important endangered or threatened species is identified. Threats to the species and habitats of the area include various types of fishing and interference from large vessels or commercial tourism outfits.

A large and complex site with numerous species and habitats would likely point to the need for a marine protected area: an Oceans Act MPA, a National Marine Conservation Area or a marine National Wildlife Area.

Example 3

An Indigenous community has identified a coastal area, including islands and adjacent ocean, as needing protection to ensure the long-term sustainability of their subsistence harvest which includes certain whale species. The area also provides habitat for many breeding and migrating birds, as well as other species listed under the Species at Risk Act, including polar bears.

As this situation requires a terrestrial-marine ecosystem approach, a National Wildlife Area designated under the Wildlife Area Regulations of the Canada Wildlife Act would be an appropriate tool.

Example 4

An Indigenous community has identified an underwater volcano of cultural and spiritual significance. The volcano is threatened by various forms of fishing and the community has requested protection for it. The surrounding ocean exhibits great biodiversity and productivity that is, in part, the result of the ecosystem created by the volcano.

Taken together, these factors would likely make an Oceans Act MPA the most appropriate tool for protection of the ecosystem, habitat and species in the area, although a National Marine Conservation Area could also be possible. A joint agreement between the Government of Canada and the relevant Indigenous government or community could be developed for governance and management of the area.  

Example 5

A marine area provides foraging habitat for more than 1 million nesting seabirds each year. Some of the migratory birds this area attracts are at risk globally or listed under Canada’s Species at Risk Act. This marine area is rich in the fish species and zooplankton that the seabirds feed on.

The species needing protection and the purpose of the protection conform to the mandate of Environment and Climate Change Canada and point to using the Canada Wildlife Act to establish a marine National Wildlife Area.

Example 6

A large and unique coastal ecosystem of fjords, beaches, archipelago and open sea is home to high concentrations of many marine mammals and large kelp beds. Indigenous community well-being has been linked to the health of this marine ecosystem, and community members are interested in protecting a portion of their coastal and marine territory and playing an active role in managing the site.

The size and scope of biodiversity values in this area, as well as Indigenous interests, would make a National Marine Conservation Area the likely tool to be used, with the close collaboration of other federal regulators such as Fisheries and Oceans Canada (to manage fishing), Transport Canada (to manage shipping and navigation) and the Canadian Coast Guard (for search and rescue and training).

While tool choices in the foregoing examples are fairly obvious, sometimes the decision is not clear-cut and several options may be available. In these cases, it is usually the purposes set out in an Act or the conservation objectives for the site that indicate which tool to use. These marine conservation tools are also aligned with the mandate of the federal department or agency that governs them, but there can be, and often are, overlapping mandates that must be managed appropriately.

Examples 7-9 illustrate how the conservation objectives or purposes of an area may be aligned with the purpose of the establishing laws and the mandate of each protected-area department.

Example 7

The conservation objectives of the area relate to:

  • fish or marine mammals and/or commercial and non-commercial fishery resources
  • fish or marine mammal habitat
  • endangered or threatened species
  • critical habitat for species at risk
  • rare or unique habitats
  • areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity 
  • maintaining ecological integrity

These conservation objectives fit the mandate of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, so the area would likely be considered for MPA establishment under the Oceans Act. A National Marine Conservation Area would also be possible. Fisheries and Oceans Canada would be responsible for the management of fisheries and aquaculture within the zones where they are allowed in accordance with the Government of Canada’s federal fisheries management principles.

Example 8

The purpose for protecting the area relates to:

  • protecting marine ecosystems and biodiversity
  • conserving cultural heritage
  • managing use in an ecologically sustainable manner
  • supporting Indigenous leadership in marine conservation
  • providing benefits for Indigenous Peoples and coastal communities
  • advancing effective collaboration for management

These priorities fit the mandate of Parks Canada, so the area would likely be considered for establishment as a National Marine Conservation Area or Reserve.

Example 9

The conservation objectives of the area relate to:

  • protecting nationally important wildlife and wildlife habitat
  • migratory birds
  • species at risk

The most appropriate tool would likely be the Canada Wildlife Act as the conservation objectives fall within the mandate of Environment and Climate Change Canada. If there are fish and/or marine mammal species and marine habitat of concern in the area, Fisheries and Oceans Canada may use a Fisheries Act tool to address fishing-related risks, or Environment and Climate Change Canada may do so through its regulations under the Canada Wildlife Act in consultation with DFO and with the support of the Minister of Fisheries.

Date modified: