Introduction to stock assessment
Unit 4.3: Reaching consensus
Consensus is reached through an iterative process of:
- constructive critique
- discussion
- resolution of concerns
Sharing differing evidence-based interpretations is encouraged because science advice will benefit from their input. In many cases, consensus can be reached when participants believe that additional data or more thorough analyses could support another conclusion, but they do not oppose the proposed conclusions.
It is the responsibility of the meeting chair(s) to remind participants that the conclusions and advice must be based on demonstrated evidence or facts. When it is apparent that different conclusions are supported by various sources of data or by different but valid scientific analyses, consensus should be developed by considering the weight of evidence for each proposed conclusion.
To ensure openness and transparency, it is important to document evidence-based interpretations that are discussed but not included in the final consensus-based science advice. These evidence-based interpretations can be captured in a section of the advisory document entitled “Other Evidence-based Interpretations”.
For more information, click here for the CSAS Policy on the Principle of Consensus.
- Date modified: