Red Tape Review Progress Report
Table of contents
- Overview
- Context
- Executive Summary
- Theme 1: Streamlining Regulatory Processes for Major Projects
- Theme 2: Supporting the Fish and Seafood Sector by Simplifying and Streamlining Processes
- Comprehensive Review and Streamlining of National Licensing Policies and Processes
- Flexible Vessel Transfers in the Offshore Northern Shrimp Fishery
- Conservation-based Policy Review of the Recreational Groundfish Fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
- Streamlining Ghost Gear Removal in Canadian Waters
- Inshore Regulations Review
- Comprehensive Review of the Fishery (General) Regulations
- Fisher's Resource Portal: plain language information portal
- Proposed Regulatory Amendments Relating to Soak Time
- Administrative efficiency in the Capelin Fishery
- Transition from Paper Nautical Charts to Electronic Charts
- Updating the Regulatory Framework for Recreational Fishing in BC (Salmon and Other Species)
- Nunavut Fishery Regulations
- Theme 3: Greater Efficiency at the Border
Overview
Regulations safeguard the health, safety, and security of Canadians and the environment, while also supporting a competitive and productive economy. Red tape in the regulatory system – including complicated or outdated processes, unnecessary, duplicative or overly burdensome rules, or inefficient or unpredictable regulatory administration or service delivery – is a barrier to investment, innovation and growth. Cutting red tape from the regulatory system can save Canadians and businesses time and money. To lower costs for Canadians and build a stronger economy, the Government of Canada launched a 60-day red tape review across departments and agencies with regulatory responsibilities.
As part of this initiative, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) reviewed its regulatory programs and developed the Department's Red Tape Review Progress Report (Report). The Report lists actions that DFO is taking and plans to take over the short, medium and long term to eliminate red tape, which will reduce paperwork, streamline processes, clarify rules and promote compliance with regulations while upholding our commitments to environmental protection and conservation. These actions include removing outdated regulations, reducing duplication and increasing coordination with provincial and territorial regulatory partners, and making it easier to access services, such as licence and authorization applications.
Context
DFO administers laws and regulations to manage and protect Canada's aquatic ecosystems, fisheries resources, and marine infrastructure. The base of this framework is the Fisheries Act, which governs fish harvesting, fish and fish habitat protection, aquatic invasive species prevention, and licensing. The Fisheries Act must be reviewed every five years (required under section 92 of the Act). The House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans will continue the Fisheries Act review in the coming months and will present its final report and recommendations to Parliament, once it is finalized. The Committee's review is one of many ways the Department identifies opportunities to reduce red tape, protect Canada's fisheries, maintain vibrant coastal communities, continue to advance reconciliation, and promote the long-term health of aquatic ecosystems. Other important laws include the Oceans Act, which supports marine conservation and planning, and the Species at Risk Act, which protects wildlife species at risk of extinction.
DFO oversees many regulations that guide operational parts of fisheries management, including region-specific regulations such as the Pacific Fishery Regulations and Atlantic Fishery Regulations, 1985, which aretailored to local contexts. DFO is responsible for the Fishery (General) Regulations, which cover licensing procedures, gear restrictions, observer programs, and enforcement mechanisms. The Aquaculture Activities Regulations and Marine Mammal Regulations cover aquaculture and marine biodiversity. The Authorizations Concerning Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Regulations set out requirements and service standards for the review of projects that may harm fish and fish habitat. These laws and regulations provide for the sustainable use of aquatic resources, conservation of habitats, and compliance with international obligations.
Fisheries decision-making and licensing in Canada are informed by collaboration with Indigenous Peoples and provincial and territorial governments, and through scientific assessments and engagement with industry stakeholders and environmental organizations. DFO follows a set annual cycle for fisheries management, guided by principles of conservation, Indigenous rights, and orderly fishing. These mechanisms provide the Department with ongoing opportunities to identify and address red tape proactively.
For example, DFO reviews projects that may impact fish and fish habitat from across a range of industrial sectors including energy, transportation, infrastructure, electrical, critical minerals, and forestry. These project reviews are done in consultation with Indigenous Peoples, respecting Indigenous rights. DFO also considers factors such as fisheries management objectives, cumulative effects, Indigenous Knowledge (when it is provided) and whether harmful impacts can be avoided, mitigated or offset when deciding whether projects should be authorized. When projects are authorized, DFO monitors to make sure avoidance, mitigation, and offsetting measures included as conditions of the authorization are taken. Most recently, red tape reduction has been pursued in this area of work in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on Regulatory and Permitting Efficiency for Clean Growth Projects.
Collaboration is central to fisheries science and data collection and is essential to informing regulatory decisions. For example, DFO has entered into multi-year agreements with industry groups and other partners to co-develop and carry out ecosystem surveys. These partnerships use industry expertise and Indigenous knowledge to increase data quality and coverage, which informs sustainable management strategies. These cooperative efforts are vital for meeting Canada's international commitments and supporting the long-term viability of coastal and Indigenous communities.
Executive Summary
In addition to the Department's ongoing work to eliminate red tape, the Report identifies short-, medium-, and long-term initiatives that underscore these efforts. In line with the Cabinet Directive on Regulation, the Department systematically finds opportunities to simplify processes, clarify rules and reduce the administrative burden on industry and Canadians.
The Report spans all regions of Canada, and includes several ongoing and new initiatives to streamline processes, lower costs for Canadians and build a stronger economy. Some of the initiatives included in the Report – for example, Streamlining Ghost Gear Removal – stem from the Blue Economy Regulatory Review (BERR). In partnership with Transport Canada (TC), Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada (ISED), Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), and the National Research Council (NRC), the BERR included a targeted engagement process (2022-23) seeking input across five themes: Marine renewable energy and environmental protection; Marine spatial planning; Maritime autonomous surface ships; Ocean technology; and Sustainable fishing gear and practices. This work resulted in the Blue Economy: Targeted Regulatory Review – Regulatory Roadmap, published in 2024, that lists initiatives to reduce red tape and streamline processes within these five themes. Many of these initiatives have been completed or are in progress.
The Report focuses on three themes:
Theme 1: Streamlining Regulatory Processes for Major Projects
Actions under this theme include streamlining authorization and permitting processes by reducing administrative burden and increasing clarity for Canadians, industry and regulatory partners. Getting major projects built in Canada is a priority. Federal departments and agencies have been reviewing policies and practices to accelerate decision-making and improve the delivery of project assessments, permits, licences, and authorizations for major projects.
Theme 2: Supporting the Fish and Seafood Sector by Simplifying and Streamlining Processes
Actions under this theme include simplifying administrative processes for Canadians, industry, and regulatory partners, including licensing and authorizations, which are often identified as a source of red tape. The Department identifies and addresses these issues using a risk-based approach and through ongoing engagement across Canada. The Report highlights some of the Department's work to simplify various processes by using AI and IT systems, as well as other tools, to improve service delivery. This theme also includes improving regulatory services by updating policies and guidelines for Canadians, industry and regulatory partners to help them meet regulatory requirements more efficiently and demonstrates the Department's commitment to supporting the Canadian fishing industry.
Theme 3: Greater Efficiency at the Border
Actions under this theme aim to help improve the flow of goods and people at the border.
DFO remains committed to identifying and addressing red tape. While the list of specific measures in this Report is expected to contribute to removing red tape over time, it is not meant to be exhaustive. DFO will continue to work internally and with Indigenous partners and stakeholders to advance measures that identify and address red tape while delivering on the Department's core mandate.
For the purposes of this report, short term means less than 12 months, medium term is 12-24 months, and long-term is 2-5 years.
Theme 1: Streamlining Regulatory Processes for Major Projects
Regulatory efficiency for fish and fish habitat protection under the Fisheries Act
As a major federal permitting department, DFO has a large role to play in achieving the Government's objective to get major projects built in Canada, while upholding Canada's world-leading environmental standards and its constitutional obligations to Indigenous Peoples. DFO's permitting role comes from the Fisheries Act, which prohibitscausing the harmful alteration, disruption and destruction of fish habitat or death of fish (by means other than fishing). Projects that will cause these effects must be authorized by the Minister of Fisheries to be able to lawfully proceed. DFO understands that project proponents are looking for greater clarity in the regulatory system, greater flexibility in regulatory requirements, and reduced project review times. Indigenous Peoples have been clear that Indigenous rights must be respected in the design and implementation of the regulatory system and many would like a greater role in project review and approval. Environmental organizations have stressed that any changes to the regulatory system should maintain or improve environmental protection.
Actions in this section reflect DFO's commitment to support the implementation of the Building Canada Act and work with the Major Projects Office and with government partners to complete reviews of designated projects of National Interest within two years. DFO will also promote the use of standardized guidance and best practices so that proponents can efficiently undertake routine and low-risk projects. This will allow DFO to focus on higher risk and major projects to meet the Government's commitment to accelerate economic growth and competitiveness.
Action 1: Completing reviews of all National Interest projects within two years
Context
Getting major projects built in Canada is a priority. Federal departments and agencies have been reviewing policies and practices to accelerate decision-making and improve the delivery of project assessments, permits, licences, and authorizations for major projects. DFO has been working together with other federal departments to develop permitting plans, coordinate Crown consultations and increase collaboration with proponents to improve coordination related to major projects.
On June 26th, 2025, the Building Canada Act was passed into law, empowering the Government to accelerate nation-building projects, including finishing project reviews within two years, in consultation with Indigenous Peoples. DFO is committed to supporting its implementation while protecting the environment and upholding Indigenous rights, and finding opportunities for economic partnerships with Indigenous Peoples.
Action
In support of the Building Canada Act, DFO will implement new procedures to better integrate Fisheries Act project reviews with the impact assessment process. For example, DFO will work with other departments so that proponents only need to provide project information once, by requesting information upfront during the impact assessment phase. DFO will also work with other departments to better integrate Species at Risk Act (SARA) permitting considerations into the impact assessment process, to avoid situations where a positive impact assessment decision is received but SARA permitting conditions cannot be met. Working closely with the Major Projects Office, these efforts will help make decisions on national interest projects within the two-year deadline.
Progress Achieved
- Input into updated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines is now posted on the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada's website.
- First Annual Report to Privy Council Office: Overview of information requests is complete and will be published shortly.
Next Steps
Short term
- Draft policies, procedures, guidance, and process changes.
- Continued analysis of inefficiencies in information requests.
Medium term
- Guidance documents are published, including:
- Best practices for integrating impact assessment conditions with Fisheries Act permitting requirements;
- Guidance for proponents on frontloading permitting information requirements into the impact assessment process; and
- Tips on meeting DFO's information requirements.
Expected Outcomes
- Policies and procedures integrate Fisheries Act considerations into the impact assessment process, resulting in more efficient information requests and timely decisions.
- Policy and procedures ensure that SARA permitting requirements are considered efficiently during the impact assessment process.
- All projects of National Interest are reviewed by DFO within a two-year time period under the Building Canada Act.
Action 2: Simplified approaches to low-risk and routine projects
Context
Many of the projects that proponents submit to the Department are for low-risk and routine projects with some increased risk to fish and fish habitat. DFO recognizes that in many cases proponents can avoid or reduce the risk of harmful impacts to fish and fish habitat using standardized, common measures, such that the projects do not need to be submitted for review. Where harmful impacts cannot be fully avoided or reduced and an authorization is needed, current Fisheries Act regulations lack flexibility, and treat all projects the same way, regardless of risk.
Action
DFO will introduce a suite of user-friendly, digitally-focused tools that equip proponents of low-risk projects with standardized measures or best practices to avoid or reduce the risk of harmful impacts, which eliminates the need for DFO review.
For projects that require authorization, DFO will propose regulatory changes to simplify the requirements for projects based on the level of risk to fish and fish habitat. In addition, DFO is advancing regulations to automatically approve routine projects with well-understood impacts on fish and fish habitat (known as "prescribed works", beginning with the maintenance and repair of municipal drains in Ontario) when set conditions are met. This work is only a starting point for DFO, with future opportunities to explore streamlining project requirements across different regions in Canada.
Progress Achieved
- The Overview of DFO's Risk Management Framework was published January 2025.
- DFO published 12 interim or final standards and codes of practice.
Next Steps
Short term
- Continue to put new codes of practice and standardized avoidance and mitigation measures in place for additional categories of low risk and routine projects.
- Complete first equivalency audit of industry Best Management Practices with the hydroelectric industry.
- Complete first set of Prescribed Works and Waters Regulations for Maintenance and Repair of Ontario Municipal Drains.
Medium term
- Complete additional equivalency audit of industry Best Management Practices.
- Continued promotion of use and development of codes of practice and standards.
- Changes to the Authorizations Concerning Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Regulations to better align information requirements with project risk.
- Find opportunities for additional regulatory approaches to other prescribed activities that impact fish and fish habitat.
Expected Outcomes
- Science-informed tools (i.e. codes of practice, standardized measures) and prescribed regulations reduce the number of low risk and routine projects that proponents submit to DFO for review, providing increased clarity for proponents and reducing red tape without compromising fish habitat protection.
- Regulatory amendments simplify and match information requirements with likely project risk, reducing permitting backlogs for DFO and accelerating proponent activities.
Action 3: Streamlining the approach to higher risk and major projects
Action
DFO will introduce a streamlined service for proponents to improve service and speed up project review. DFO will give proponents information requirements, local Indigenous concerns, and any other information DFO has to support efficient project planning. This service will include a proponent portal that will clarify departmental requirements and approval processes, and support online authorization application and submission.
DFO will also simplify the Fisheries Act authorization process, and match information requirements with project risk. These changes will be supported by an online tool proponents can use to complete and submit applications, replacing the existing manual process.
DFO will make these changes while continuing to uphold environmental standards and consulting with Indigenous communities. For example, proposed changes to the Authorizations Concerning Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Regulations will include a requirement for proponents of higher-risk, major projects to engage early with Indigenous Peoples so that they have timely access to project details and can liaise directly with the proponent. Strengthening these relationships will streamline Crown consultation efforts later in the regulatory process. Project-by-project Indigenous consultation will be complemented by an additional emphasis on proactive relationship and trust-building with Indigenous Peoples. This collaborative approach will foster a more cohesive and effective consultation process, leading to stronger and more efficient outcomes for Indigenous Peoples, DFO, and proponents.
Progress Achieved
- Interim guidance on the Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program's Duty to Consult are developed and training is in development.
- Tip sheets for efficient project planning are published.
Next steps
Short term
- Launch a streamlined service to help proponents of high-risk and major projects.
- Continue to promote collaborative discussions with Indigenous Nations to draft consultation protocols for proactive relationship and trust-building.
Medium term
- Develop and launch online portal that proponents can use for authorization submissions, along with additional digital platforms, standards and tools to improve service and streamline project review.
- Changes to the Authorizations Concerning Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Regulations to:
- match information requirements with project risk; and
- require proponents of higher-risk projects to engage early with Indigenous Peoples.
Expected Outcomes
- Predictable and clear regulatory processes ensure proponents receive permits faster.
- Indigenous Peoples are contacted by proponents of higher-risk major projects, and report improved awareness of project details and ability to provide input to proponents.
- Protocols with interested Indigenous Nations support efficient consultations.
Theme 2: Supporting the Fish and Seafood Sector by Simplifying and Streamlining Processes
Comprehensive Review and Streamlining of National Licensing Policies and Processes
Context
Commercial fisheries licensing policies are national frameworks administered by DFO across Canada. In addition, on the East Coast, each DFO administrative region has its own licensing policy that tailors national policies to the region's unique social, economic, and ecological conditions. National policies establish a consistent and transparent framework for registering commercial fishing enterprises and vessels and issuing licences. National and regional policies apply to most commercial marine fisheries in New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Quebec.
Actions
During broad consultations in 2023, stakeholders said the Department's fisheries management regime was complex and administratively burdensome and asked for more chances to provide feedback. See the What we heard report: Vessel and related policies that support Owner-Operator for the complete consultation report.
In response, the Department is undertaking a comprehensive review of all national and regional licensing policies and processes and has identified priority areas where streamlining known regulatory burdens will provide meaningful benefits to the fish and seafood sector. For example, the Gulf Region is assessing the regional Commercial Licensing Policy to streamline proof of residency requirements for substitute operators. These efforts will simplify processes for government and industry, enhance transparency for partners, and improve service across regions.
The Department is also actively developing digital solutions and reviewing processes to improve licensing and data management in the fisheries sector. In the Maritimes Region, IT systems are being upgraded to better track substitute vessel use, allowing more flexibility for fishers and improving the accuracy of effort and landings data. The Maritimes Region is also working to make commonly used licensing forms available online. Meanwhile, a pilot project between Quebec and Pacific Regions is testing the use of artificial intelligence to digitize paper-based fishing data, which could reduce the administrative burden on fishers and improve data collection efficiency. Collectively, these initiatives aim to modernize operations, improve service delivery, and make it easier for industry to comply with regulatory requirements.
Next Steps:
Short Term
- Finalize list of priorities within the national and regional licensing policies and guidelines to improve clarity, efficiency, and service delivery.
- Develop proposals and begin stakeholder engagement and consultation.
Medium Term
- National and Regional engagement with stakeholders on relevant red tape reduction proposals, which will be updated based on feedback received.
Long Term
- Put red tape reduction actions in place once stakeholders' support.
- Establish process to regularly review red tape to ensure it responds to the needs of harvesters.
Expected Outcomes
- All national and regional licensing policies and processes are reviewed to find and address unnecessary, inefficient, outdated or duplicative policies, practices and systems.
- Licensing policies and guidelines are reviewed and updated to improve clarity, efficiency, and service delivery.
- Digital tools will be developed to improve fisheries licensing and data management.
Flexible Vessel Transfers in the Offshore Northern Shrimp Fishery
Context
Commercial fishing vessels must be registered with DFO and linked to a single licence holder, as required by regulations and policy. However, the current process—requiring a new Vessel Registration Card for each transfer—creates delays and costs due to system limitations and manual processing, especially impacting northern Indigenous and offshore harvesters. These inefficiencies can lead to significant economic losses and slow vessel redeployment during short, environmentally unpredictable fishing seasons. Stakeholders identified more flexible vessel transfer procedures as a priority, which aligns with federal efforts to reduce red tape and enhance economic competitiveness.
Actions
In response, DFO developed a pilot project in the offshore Northern Shrimp fleet (using vessels 100' length overall and greater) that relaxes the requirement that vessels be registered in the name of the licence holder using the vessel. Under the pilot that started on April 1, 2024, registered vessels may be listed on multiple licences, and any participating licence holder may use any registered vessel listed in their licence conditions without additional registration steps or fees. Vessels may only fish one licence at a time. This is managed through amended vessel schedules issued by DFO authorizing each specific licence. If the pilot is a success, DFO will look to make the changes more permanent for the offshore Northern Shrimp fishery.
Progress Achieved
- Two-year pilot (April 1, 2024–March 31, 2026) relaxing vessel registration attribution and vessel transfer requirements for the offshore Northern Shrimp fleet.
- Launched a streamlined digital vessel transfer process (via the National Online Licensing System, NOLS), with new notification and real-time tracking features.
- Changed licence conditions to enable multi-licence vessel listing and to clarify compliance expectations for harvesters.
- Engaged and communicated with Northern Shrimp fleet stakeholders and Indigenous partners to raise awareness of pilot requirements.
Next Steps
Short and Medium term
- Continue to monitor and evaluate the pilot for compliance, unintended consequences, resource impacts, and enforcement effectiveness, and seek stakeholder feedback about potentially extending the pilot program for an additional year (to March 31, 2027).
- Conduct a review of the pilot, including stakeholder consultations, before the pilot program ends to evaluate outcomes and inform next steps.
Long term
- Assess resource implications, regulatory impacts, and technical adjustments that would be needed to permanently adopt the flexibility in the Northern Shrimp fishery.
Expected Outcomes
- Stakeholders (offshore shrimp licence holders, including Indigenous partners) face less administrative burden and business delays caused by vessel transfer processing limitations. Specifically, the pilot supports:
- Timely vessel transfers, removing dependency on DFO business hours for critical approvals.
- Better quota utilization and overall sector competitiveness by reducing lost fishing days and associated opportunity costs.
- Enhanced flexibility in fleet management and strengthened Indigenous participation in the fishery.
Conservation-based Policy Review of the Recreational Groundfish Fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador
Context
The recreational groundfish fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador is governed by a suite of regulations and management measures. Currently for conservation purposes, there is a per-person daily catch limit and a maximum boat limit. The boat limit is designed to both promote conservation and safety at sea by discouraging overcrowding of a vessel to maximize catch per trip. Many recreational anglers oppose the boat limit and maintain each vessel operator should determine the safest operating capacity of their vessel.
Actions
The Department will launch public consultations to gather input on this fishery and to discuss the distinct differences in the health of the province's three cod populations. While the stocks on the south and west coasts remain in the Critical Zone, the Northern cod stock status has improved. Recognizing the importance of cod to coastal communities, the approach will focus its conservation efforts on enforceable management measures, including the daily bag limit and season dates. DFO will develop stronger links to existing Transport Canada information in the Safe Boating Guide and the Pleasure Craft Operator certification program to support safety through clear, effective, and modernized rules.
Next Steps
Short term
- Launch a public opinion survey in the fall of 2025 to evaluate the desire to modernize this policy.
- Establish new measures, as required, to be in place for the 2026 recreational groundfish season.
Expected Outcomes
- Recognizing the cultural importance of the cod fishery to Newfoundland and Labrador, modernize the fishery while promoting safety and conservation.
- Eliminate duplication, as the safety requirements of operating capacity of a vessel is already covered under guidance issued by Transport Canada.
Streamlining Ghost Gear Removal in Canadian Waters
Context
Abandoned, lost, or discarded fishing gear (ALDFG), also known as ‘ghost gear', is a major source of marine plastic pollution. It contributes to declining fish stocks through ghost fishing, entangles marine mammals and birds, poses navigation hazards, and damages aquatic ecosystems. While ideally, harvesters could retrieve any ghost gear they encounter, effective oversight of its retrieval is essential. Ghost gear removal must be carefully monitored to avoid accidentally removing gear still in use, legally placed gear, and to ensure that relaxed rules for retrieving ghost gear do not hinder the detection of illegal fishing. " Therefore, it is critical to develop a streamlined framework that enables effective ghost gear retrieval while addressing these concerns and preventing potential abuse.
Currently, Canada does not have regulations specifically for ghost gear, so, DFO addresses it under the Wrecked, Abandoned or Hazardous Vessels Act (WAHVA) and the Fishery (General) Regulations. The current framework could be changed to enable in-season retrievals and address the requirements under the WAHVA to notify owners of retrieved ghost gear and securely store it for 30 days. These changes would reduce administrative, financial and logistical burden for those retrieving gear.
Actions
The Department will modernize the management of ghost gear and create a streamlined, stakeholder-informed framework for retrievals, both in and out of season. This aligns with DFO's commitment made in the Blue Economy Regulatory Review Roadmap to review the framework to enable in-season retrieval, a priority for stakeholders and partners. New or amended Fisheries Act regulations may be necessary to t update the framework.
Progress Achieved
- Improvements to modernize the Fishing Gear Reporting System (FGRS) are continuously being made. For example, in 2024, offline lost gear reporting became available and DFO plans to launch offline gear retrieval reporting soon.
- A pilot program enabling in-season retrieval and disposal of lost gear has been available to commercial harvesters in the Arctic since 2020, providing DFO with valuable insights for future in-season retrieval activities. This pilot will help identify the processes required to implement in-season retrievals in other regions.
- DFO has gathered extensive feedback on barriers to ghost gear management, including through 17 virtual meetings held in the summer of 2024, an online public survey in November 2024, and the 2nd International Fishing Gear Innovation Summit held in Moncton in February 2025.
Next Steps
Short to medium term
- Continue to seek feedback on streamlining ghost gear retrieval activities in 2025 and 2026.
- Complete the regulatory review to identify barriers and ways to manage ghost gear more effectively and efficiently.
Long term
- Deliver a Ghost Gear Action Plan in 2027, which will define DFO's strategy and actions going forward.
Expected Outcomes
- Streamlining the process for ghost gear retrievals, both in and post season, supports more retrieval, reduces the administrative burden associated with applications and makes it easier to dispose of or recycle ghost gear.
- Addressing ghost gear will strengthen Canada's reputation among sustainable seafood certifiers, such as the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).
Inshore Regulations Review
Context
Supporting the health of coastal fishing communities is central to the Owner-Operator and Fleet Separation policies, which were codified in the Atlantic Fishery Regulations, 1985 and the Maritime Provinces Fishery Regulations. These are commonly referred to as the "Inshore Regulations." The objective of the Inshore Regulations is to promote profitable operations for independent fishing enterprises so that the economic benefits remain in the hands of local harvesters and their communities.
The Inshore Regulations guide the Department's approach to licensing in the inshore sector. Specifically, licences can only be issued to those deemed eligible by the Department; harvesters must personally fish under the licence; and there are rules around use and benefits from the licence. Since the regulations were put in place, harvesters have raised some issues that could be addressed to improve the overall effectiveness of the regulations.
Actions
The Department is currently reviewing the Inshore Regulations in response to industry's concerns with DFO's approach to enforcing the regulations, aiming to identify policy and regulatory gaps and to clarify its enforcement with stakeholders and third party lenders.
The Department is exploring options including clarifying key concepts, developing policy for existing authorities under the regulations, strengthening existing regulations and reviewing guidance documents. After the policy development phase, broader regulatory or administrative changes might be made. Stakeholders would be engaged to provide feedback and be given notice prior to changes being made.
Next Steps
Short Term
- Narrow down the list of policies and processes that can be updated to clarify the regulations.
- Identify the scope of policy and regulatory amendments and conduct internal analysis.
- Develop proposals and engage with stakeholders.
Medium Term
- Integrate stakeholder feedback into revised proposals.
- Finalize and start implementing policy components.
- Finalize and submit the proposal to begin formal regulatory amendments.
Long Term
- Implement regulatory changes.
Expected Outcomes
- Stakeholders will have more clarity on how to maintain use and control over the rights and privileges stemming from fishing licence through various agreements and arrangements.
- Better informed administrative decisions and enforcement actions are expected if there is greater clarity regarding the consequences of not complying with the regulations.
Comprehensive Review of the Fishery (General) Regulations
Context
The Fishery (General) Regulations (FGR), under the Fisheries Act, are a catch-all framework where more specific or regional regulations do not apply. Unlike regional regulations (e.g., Atlantic Fishery Regulations, 1985, Pacific Fishery Regulations), the FGR is national in scope, applied across all sectors, used where no more specific regulation exists, and acts as the default regulation. However, many of the administrative provisions do not reflect the needs of today's complex business operations and the digital age. DFO will undertake a comprehensive review of the FGR.
Among the range of potential changes, below are two actions being considered:
Action 1: Reducing Red Tape for Observers at Sea
The administrative burden on companies providing at-sea observer and dockside monitoring services would be eased by extending the current re-designation period. Currently, frequent re-designations create significant workload and delays for both service providers and DFO. Stakeholders have voiced concerns that the process is inefficient and not aligned with best practices. This change supports broader efforts to reduce red tape while ensuring strong oversight.
Next Steps
Short to medium term
- Working across regions, DFO will consult with stakeholders to finalize policy updates, and develop a medium- to long-term transition plan, including potential changes to the FGR to implement the policy approach.
Expected Outcomes
- Harvesters are expected to benefit from fewer re-designation cycles and accredited service providers will have greater stability and predictability.
Action 2: Use New Digital Tools
The Department is modernizing the FGR by using new technology to improve service delivery and stakeholder accessibility. DFO is developing a proposal to establish a policy framework, consultation plans, and targeted outcomes.
Next steps
Short to medium term
- Refine the policy approach and plan stakeholder engagement over the short to medium term.
Expected Outcomes
- Faster decision-making, enhanced compliance, and more consistent enforcement. Harvesters are expected to benefit from streamlined regulatory processes, digital licensing, electronic logbooks, automated notifications, and improved data accuracy.
Fisher's Resource Portal: plain language information portal
Context
Commercial fishers face many significant regulatory obligations when starting and operating a fishing business, while also considering a great number of parameters, risks and obstacles that may impact their business. These challenges are particularly relevant for small owner-operator businesses. Stakeholders have reported that information and guidance on DFO's website is difficult to understand and hard to access.
Actions
The Department is responding to feedback from stakeholders and partners to create a Plain Language Information Portal (the Portal) for commercial harvesters. The Portal will offer plain language guidance for businesses in all stages of their operations, including new entrants, current licence holders and retiring harvesters.
Progress Achieved
The Portal is currently a draft pilot, targeted to potential and current inshore licence holders in Eastern Canada and Quebec.
Next Steps
Short-Term
- Share the draft pilot with external partners (e.g., fishing associations, business experts, provincial governments, and other federal organizations) for feedback in the fall of 2025.
Medium-Term
- Finalize and launch the Portal, making it available to the public.
- Raise awareness of the Portal through different communication materials to stakeholders and partners.
- Establish a strategy to ensure the information in the Portal stays up to date.
Long-Term
- Potentially expand the Portal to other fisheries in Canada.
Expected Outcomes
- Harvesters will benefit from easy access to centralized information on starting, managing, and exiting a fishing business, educational content on risks and mitigation tools and details on supports and financing options.
Proposed Regulatory Amendments Relating to Soak Time
Context
The Atlantic Fishery Regulations (AFR), Maritime Provinces Fishery Regulations (MPFR) and Newfoundland and Labrador Fishery Regulations (NLFR) prohibit leaving fishing gear unattended in the water for more than 72 consecutive hours to minimize loss of fishing gear, unintended fishing mortality, potential gear conflict and spoilage of catch. These gear tending or "soak time" requirements apply to all fixed gear fisheries throughout waters in which these regulations apply.
Industry stakeholders, particularly offshore operators, have expressed that these requirements are impractical, costly and may inadvertently pose safety risks to crew. Maintaining these requirements in regulation is also unnecessary given the Minister of Fisheries has the authority to specify soak times as a condition of licence.
Actions
DFO is developing amendments to the AFR, MPFR and NLFR to provide for flexibility to consider alternative gear tending (soak time) requirements on a fishery-by-fishery basis. This would allow for more responsive and adaptive management.
Progress Achieved
- The regulatory proposal was added to the department's Forward Regulatory Plan for 2024-2026.
- Some commercial fleets have already been engaged in the development of the proposal.
Next Steps
Short Term
- Finalize the regulatory policy framework and engagement plan. While some commercial fleets have already been engaged in the development of the proposal, broader engagement is being planned for fall 2025 with industry stakeholders, Indigenous rights holders, and the environmental non-governmental organization community through a variety of meetings.
Medium Term
- Once external engagement is complete and if the proposed changes are approved, the regulatory amendments would come into law.
Expected Outcomes
- Stakeholders will have more flexibility, improved compliance, fewer costs and a reduced carbon footprint where soak times are longer than currently permitted by regulation.
- Licence conditions can be tailored to meet the needs of specific fisheries, regions, seasons and gear types.
- These changes will align with a risk-based regulatory approach and support innovation by enabling pilot programs.
Administrative efficiency in the Capelin Fishery
Context
The commercial capelin fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador supports harvesters, processors, plant workers and coastal communities.
Each year, season opening dates are determined in consultation with industry stakeholders and are based on industry quality standards (i.e., readiness of capelin for the marketplace as determined through biological sampling). DFO works closely with industry to assess sampling results and align fishery openings with market conditions and industry recommendations. The fishery for each bay and fleet is closed when their respective allocation is reached.
The season occurs over a short timeframe, often just one or two days per bay or fleet, often on the weekend depending on market conditions and the amount of available quota. This results in a surge of work to open and close the fishery, respond to industry requests and monitor landings in a fishery where any delays in DFO processes are highly impactful to harvesters, due to the short open season.
Actions
The Department reviewed the current operational and regulatory procedures for opening and closing the capelin fishery to find opportunities for efficiencies. Following the review, DFO started a pilot to evaluate the proposed improvements, and recommend best practices to implement more broadly.
Progress Achieved
- DFO implemented a pilot project in 2025 to test a more flexible approach to procedures mainly related to closing the capelin fishery. Stakeholders have provided positive feedback on the responsiveness and effectiveness of this new approach.
Next Steps
Medium Term
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot and whether it could be made permanent for the capelin fishery and possibly expanded to other fisheries.
Expected Outcomes
- The capelin fishery will open and close more quickly and with greater flexibility in response to their recommendations and available quota.
Transition from Paper Nautical Charts to Electronic Charts
Context
The Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS) is modernizing navigation and reducing administrative burden through digital navigation tools, which offer real-time updates and improved safety. As CHS charts are already in digital-only formats, and peer organizations are adopting similar approaches, CHS will collaborate with Transport Canada and industry stakeholders to modernize the Navigation Safety Regulations to allow mariners, especially those on smaller vessels, to rely solely on electronic charts using tablets, smartphones and other devices.
Actions
The Department has begun phasing out paper nautical charts and is working with Transport Canada to support their transition to a fully digital Electronic Navigational Charts (ENCs) system. Once the requirements for paper charts are completely removed, CHS will phase them out completely.
Progress Achieved
- CHS has reviewed internal paper chart inventory and usage and has developed a roadmap for sunsetting paper charts.
- CHS has started engagement with key partners and Transport Canada.
- CHS identified the regulatory and operational requirements to phase out paper charts.
Next Steps
Short-Term
- Plan the full decommissioning of the Notices to Mariners (NtM) chart correction system.
- Engage with stakeholders to confirm their readiness and support.
Medium-Term
- Develop a proposal to update the Navigation Safety Regulations.
Long-Term
- CHS will implement the updated Navigation Safety Regulations as appropriate and once approved. The Department will publish a sunset schedule for paper chart products, including a transition plan for mariners and partners.
Expected Outcomes
- Electronic charts reflect real-time updates and improve safety on the waters which will benefit Canadian mariners and industry.
- Canadian ports and waterways will be able to leverage AI-driven machine-to-machine technologies, which will drive economic growth by achieving maximum delivery efficiency, reducing wait times and significantly reducing vessel turn-around times.
- Eliminating the Notices to Mariners and chart maintenance process will result in cost-savings and simplified processes for mariners, in addition to reduced administrative burden. Electronic charts will streamline CHS workflows, allowing resources to be redirected toward more responsive services for mariners.
- Canada remains a leader in hydrographic services as the transition aligns the CHS with international standards.
Updating the Regulatory Framework for Recreational Fishing in BC (Salmon and Other Species)
Context
Under the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative (PSSI), DFO has committed to strengthening the resilience of the recreational fishing sector by updating outdated regulations and modernizing management tools and approaches. As part of this effort, the British Columbia Sport Fishing Regulations, 1996 (BCSFR)have undergone a thorough review.
Significant progress has been made to develop a three-phased regulatory amendment approach to modernize regulatory and licensing tools in BC. Reflecting the complexity of consultations and development required, Phase I is the simplest and Phase III is the most complex. This report highlights phases I and II as they are the most advanced with policy work and consultations still needed to be undertaken for phase III.
Actions
Phase I focuses on streamlining rules by shifting management actions from licence conditions to regulations, enabling real-time adjustments to support sustainable recreational fishing. Phase II introduces a gear schedule to allow for gear type changes during a recreational fishing season enhancing conservation and recreational opportunities. Additionally, new digital tools such as the FishingBC App, an updated regulation guide, and a location-based Regulations Map have been developed to facilitate public access to licensing and regulatory information.
Progress Achieved
- The BCSFRhas undergone an extensive review process under the PSSI. New technologies and tools were developed to support recreational fishers access and understanding regulations.
- Consultation and engagement on Phase I and II have occurred, including meetings with the Sport Fish Advisory Board, First Nations, the Province of BC, and other stakeholders.
- Regulatory development is advanced for Phase I and has begun for Phase II.
Next Steps
Medium to long term
- Develop a recommendation and proposal for regulatory amendments and implementation of Phase I and II.
- Continue to develop modern technologies to support the public and reduce burden on accessing government resources and information.
Expected Outcomes
- Phase I and II will support improved management, modernize and create flexible regulatory tools, and support the coastal economy for the recreational fishery sector in BC. These changes will streamline and increase efficiency of fishery management.
Nunavut Fishery Regulations
Context
Currently, fisheries in Nunavut and surrounding waters are regulated under the Northwest Territories Fishery Regulations and other regulations.
The proposed Nunavut Fishery Regulations (NFR) will provide a new set of modern tools while eliminating outdated regulations and regulatory overlap. The co-development of these new fisheries regulations for Nunavut and surrounding waters will allow fisheries to be managed in collaboration with Indigenous rightsholders while upholding the provisions of various modern land claims agreements.
Actions
DFO has been working with partners on the Nunavut Fishery Regulations Working Group (NFRWG) (Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., Makivvik, Cree Nation Government, Government of Nunavut, with the wildlife management boards participating as observers) to co-develop new fishery regulations.
Progress Achieved
- The NFRWG completed the co-developed Policy Intent for the Nunavut Fishery Regulations in December 2024, which received ministerial approval. In Winter of 2025, DFO, with working group partners, held 3 engagements workshops in Nunavut to present the policy proposal to and receive feedback from Inuit partners and stakeholders.
- Planning is underway to engage with Nunavik Inuit and Eeyou Cree and engagement with other rightsholders and stakeholders is ongoing. All engagement is expected to be complete by the end of the 2025/26 fiscal year.
- DFO, Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., and the Pangnirtung Hunters and Trappers Organization are piloting a Communal Fish Plan to test one of the foundational policy elements in the proposed NFR framework. The pilot aims to assess real-world needs, costs, and challenges before broader implementation. Future pilots for other communities and species are under consideration.
Next Steps
Short term
- Complete engagement sessions with both rights-holders and stakeholders on the Policy Intent this fiscal year.
Medium term to long term
- Continue co-development and collaboration activities, including through the NFRWG work on the detailed regulatory design.
- Work with Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada towards the necessary Nunavut Agreement amendments to implement the Communal Fish Plan tool.
- Advance regulatory changes for Governor in Council approval.
Expected Outcomes
- New regulations would provide consistency of harvesting rights and wildlife management established under the land claims agreements and would provide clarity on fisheries management rules in the area of application of the Nunavut Fishery Regulations. Regulations would also support timely fisheries management decision-making processes for the North, with decisions being made closer to the wharf.
- Advances Canada's reconciliation efforts with Indigenous communities through the co-development of the regulations and engagement with rightsholders to solicit early and ongoing feedback into the regulations.
- Support the priorities of Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. and the Inuit Nunangat Policy to advance self-determination by creating a modern fisheries management regime that further implements the respective land claims agreements and promotes sustainability and economic diversification in the Nunavut Settlement Area, Nunavik Marine Region, Eeyou Marine Region and adjacent areas.
Theme 3: Greater Efficiency at the Border
Improve Services for the Fish and Seafood Sector Through Collaboration with the Canada Border Services Agency
Context
Effective, efficient border enforcement is vital to protecting the health, safety, and security of Canadians. At the same time, border enforcement must be done in a manner that helps facilitate trade, while securing economic prosperity for Canadians. The Canada Border Services (CBSA) administers over 100 acts and regulations at the border on behalf of various government departments.
The growing complexity and volume of border controls puts pressure on the CBSA to operationalize them effectively. Strong partnerships between CBSA and other lead departments and agencies can help CBSA apply import and export controls consistently across the country while maintaining the efficiency and fluidity that travellers and traders expect.
Actions
At the request of CBSA, DFO will embed a senior program officer in their organization. This individual will become the primary contact between DFO and CBSA. Among other things they will: inform CBSA of potential new policy and regulatory items impacting the border; provide guidance to border officers on the practical application of DFO's requirements; learn about CBSA operations and the frontline realities of administering controls and measures related to DFO; provide advice to DFO on new policy design and implementation; facilitate the development of practical processes that CBSA can implement while meeting DFO's legislative requirements; and, review existing measures that pose a hindrance to the free flow of people and goods into Canada.
Next Steps
Short term
- An individual within DFO will be assigned to the role of CBSA Embed by the end of 2025. Early priorities will include measures related to aquatic invasive species and elvers.
Expected Outcomes
- Improved services at the border through proactive collaboration on regulatory design and development, as well as procedural and operational changes informed by frontline experience.
- Date modified: