Fisheries and Oceans Canada Values and Ethics Code
Effective April 2, 2012
Table of contents
- Message from the Deputy Minister
- Part 1: Our Values in Practice
- Part 2: Guidelines and Expectations of Conduct
- 1. Care and Use of Government Property
- 2. Confidentiality and Use of Information
- 3. Providing Testimony and Information
- 4. Electronic Networks Access and Use
- 5. Duty of Loyalty
- 6. Use of Social Networks
- 7. Public Comments
- 8. Respect and Courtesy when Serving and Dealing with Clients
- 9. Off-Duty Conduct
- 10. Fishery Officer Conduct
- Part 3: Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment
- A) Definitions
- B) Prevention of Conflict of Interest
- C) General Responsibilities and Duties
- D) Conflict of Interest During Employment
- 1. Personal Assets
- 2. Outside Employment or Activities
- 3. Political Activities
- 4. Gifts, Hospitality and Other Benefits
- 5. Solicitation and Fundraising
- 6. Avoidance of Preferential Treatment
- 7. Relationship/Partnership with Stakeholders
- 8. Reporting Relationships
- E) Conflict of Interest Before and After Leaving Employment
- Part 4: Resolution of Values and Ethics Issues.
- Part 5: A Word From our Values and Ethics Champions
- Part 6: Resources and Contacts
- Part 7: Reference Documents
- Other Items of Interest
Message from the Deputy Minister
As Public Service employees, we provide services to Canadians in line with the policies of the elected government and of our department. We are responsible for the use of public funds and resources and often represent our department and the Government of Canada in our communities. Our role as public servants places us in a unique position of trust, requiring high standards of ethical behaviour that reflect our commitment to the values of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, and the Government of Canada.
Our department has an important mandate that directly touches the lives of many families and communities across Canada, and each and every one of us has a key role to play in its delivery. Every day, our jobs may present us with difficult decisions.
Building on the foundation of the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector, the Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard underscores our values. It sets out the expectations for behaviour governing all activities we perform to fulfill our mandate. It is binding on all management and employees, and it requires that we all be familiar with its content.
Just as our personal values guide our decisions in our personal lives, our organizational values embodied in these guidelines are meant to guide the daily decisions we make at work.
By itself, the Code cannot address all the issues that may arise in the course of conducting our business. Collaboration and dialogue are a critical part of the process for making sound decisions. I encourage you to embark upon this dialogue.
Public Service reputation, workplace ethics and public trust are not gained by directive or by policy; they are constructed, day in and day out, from the thousands of actions taken by us from coast to coast to coast.
To remain the great organization we are – and to enhance our reputation and standing – each and every one of us must do our part to ensure that our actions and decisions reflect our organizational values.
Let us be proud.
The Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard applies to every person employed by DFO and Coast GuardFootnote 1, including students, term employees, casual employees, seasonal and part-time workers, as well as individuals working with the Department by means of a secondment or assignment or through an Interchange Canada agreement. Employees on leave, including leave without pay, continue to be subject to the Code for the extent of their leave. Contractors and volunteers, including emeritus scientists, are expected to respect the intent of this Code.
All employees of DFO and Coast Guard, regardless of level or position, are required to adhere to the values and expected standards of behaviour articulated in this Code as a condition of employment. A breach of these values or expectations of conduct may result in disciplinary measures, up to and including termination of employment.
Management must ensure that this Code has been provided to and discussed with all new employees of the Department. However, it is the responsibility of every employee to be aware of the content of this CodeFootnote 2. This Code includes the principles and requirements of the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector and theTreasury Board Secretariat Policy on Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment to make it a one-reference document. By abiding with this Code, employees are also fulfilling their obligation under the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector and the Policy on Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment. This Code replaces the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Service, published in 2003, and the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Code of Conduct for Fishery Officers.
This Code is effective as of April 2, 2012.
PART 1: Our Values in Practice
A) Our Values
The following values are a compass to guide us in everything we do. They will support us in all our activities and enable us to better understand expectations and responsibilities within our organization. As they will often overlap, they cannot be considered in isolation from each other. This Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard is an important source of guidance for us. We are expected to take steps to integrate these values into our decisions, actions, policies, processes and systems. Similarly, we can expect to be treated in accordance with these values by our organization.
The departmental values are based on the federal public sector values of:
- Respect for democracy
- Respect for people
1. Respect for Democracy
The system of Canadian parliamentary democracy and its institutions are fundamental to serving the public interest. Public servants recognize that elected officials are accountable to Parliament, and ultimately to the Canadian people, and that a non-partisan public sector is essential to our democratic system.
Public servants shall uphold the Canadian Parliamentary democracy and its institutions by:
- 1.1 - Respecting the rule of law and carrying out their duties in accordance with legislation, policies and directives in a non-partisan and impartial manner.
- 1.2 - Loyally carrying out the lawful decisions of their leaders and supporting Ministers in their accountability to Parliament and Canadians.
- 1.3 - Providing decision-makers with all the information, analysis and advice they need, always striving to be open, candid and impartial.
At DFO and Coast Guard, Respect for Democracy also means:
- 1.4 - We align efforts, energy and expertise with government and departmental priorities.
- 1.5 - We serve the public by providing impartial service and advice that is forthright and free from political influence. We provide the same support to the elected government regardless of which political party or parties are in office.
- 1.6 - We raise concerns with management, by using the internal processes available to us.
2. Respect for People
Treating all people with respect, dignity and fairness is fundamental to our relationship with the Canadian public and colleagues, and it contributes to a safe and healthy work environment that promotes engagement, openness and transparency. The diversity of people and the ideas they generate are the source of our innovation.
Public servants shall respect human dignity and the value of every person by:
- 2.1 - Treating every person with respect and fairness.
- 2.2 - Valuing diversity and the benefit of combining the unique qualities and strengths inherent in a diverse workforce.
- 2.3 - Helping to create and maintain safe and healthy workplaces that are free from harassment and discrimination.
- 2.4 - Working together in a spirit of openness, honesty and transparency that encourages engagement, collaboration and respectful communication.
At DFO and Coast Guard, Respect for People also means:
- 2.5 - We respect human dignity.
- 2.6 - We respect the need for an appropriate balance between work and personal lives.
- 2.7 - We carefully consider the impacts of our words and actions on others.
- 2.8 - We adopt behaviour, appearance and language that promote pride in, and respect for, the Department and enhance its corporate image and reputation.
Integrity is the cornerstone of good governance and democracy. By upholding the highest ethical standards, public servants conserve and enhance public confidence in the honesty, fairness and impartiality of the federal public sector.
Public servants shall serve the public interest by:
- 3.1 - Acting at all times with integrity, and in a manner that will bear the closest public scrutiny, an obligation that may not be fully satisfied by simply acting within the law.
- 3.2 - Never using their official roles to inappropriately obtain an advantage for themselves or to advantage or disadvantage others.
- 3.3 - Taking all possible steps to prevent and resolve any real, apparent or potential conflicts of interest between their official responsibilities and their private affairs in favour of the public interest.
- 3.4 - Acting in such a way as to maintain their employer’s trust.
At DFO and Coast Guard, Integrity also means:
- 3.5 - How we achieve results is as important as the achievements themselves.
- 3.6 - We prevent and correct situations where there is, or appears to be, favouritism or nepotism.
- 3.7 - We accept responsibility for our actions and report inappropriate conduct to management in order to build and maintain trust and accountability.
- 3.8 - We live up to our commitments within the workplace and with stakeholders.
Federal public servants are entrusted to use and care for public resources responsibly, for both the short term and long term.
Public servants shall use resources responsibly by:
- 4.1 - Effectively and efficiently using the public money, property and resources managed by them.
- 4.2 - Considering the present and long-term effects that their actions have on people and the environment.
- 4.3 - Acquiring, preserving and sharing knowledge and information as appropriate, including “corporate memory” (i.e. knowledge, skills and experience developed over time).
At DFO and Coast Guard, Stewardship also means:
- 4.4 - Our transactions, including purchasing, contracting and travel, can withstand scrutiny at all times.
Excellence in the design and delivery of public sector policy, programs and services is beneficial to every aspect of Canadian public life. Engagement, collaboration, effective teamwork and professional development are all essential to a high-performing organization.
Public servants shall demonstrate professional excellence by:
- 5.1 - Providing fair, timely, efficient and effective services that respect Canada’s official languages.
- 5.2 - Continually improving the quality of policies, programs and services they provide.
- 5.3 - Fostering a work environment that promotes teamwork, learning and innovation.
At DFO and Coast Guard, Excellence also means:
- 5.4 - We ensure that we, and those for whom we are responsible, work to our full potential.
- 5.5 - We favour collaboration and consultation with internal and external stakeholders.
- 5.6 - Our actions respect our commitment to workplace safety and security.
B) Workplace Leadership
Everyone is a model for others and, as such, is a leader. No matter where we are or what our role is within the organization, modeling our behaviour and actions according to this Codedemonstratesleadership. Ethics in the workplace is a shared responsibility.
We are expected to:
- Always strive to do the right thing;
- Exemplify our organizational values in our decision making and actions;
- Maintain open, positive communications and working relationships;
- Discuss our ethical concerns;
- Report illegal activities and wrongdoing;
- Disclose and resolve possible conflict of interest situations in which we find ourselves;
- Check with our managers and the Workplace Well-Being when we are uncertain about any aspect of this Code;
- Be prepared to cooperate in investigations regarding violations of this Code.
Supervisors and managers are visible role models, especially for those people who work directly with them, and as such are held to the highest standards. Supervisor and managers lead by example and set the tone for ethical conduct. Actions speak louder than any written code.
Supervisors/managers must demonstrate ethical leadership by:
- Acting with transparency, fairness and objectivity in all transactions and work activities, including staffing, contracting, etc.;
- Exemplifying our values included in this Code and integrating them into policies, programs and work practices;
- Fostering a climate of trust and respect, which expects and supports ethical behaviour and in which concerns may be raised without fear of reprisal through open dialogue;
- Recognizing and reconciling competing values;
- Making commitments that are reasonable and achievable
- Following through on commitments;
- Foreseeing consequences of actions and decisions;
- Being alert and dealing with undesirable conduct properly and in a timely fashion;
- Holding themselves and their teams accountable;
- Promoting and recognizing excellence and ethical conduct, and encouraging personal and professional development in a learning environment;
- Promoting, exemplifying and recognizing best practices that contribute to a healthier workplace;
- Protecting from reprisal employees who disclose any serious breach of this Code in good faith.
C) Examples of Behaviours to Avoid
The expected behaviours listed in this Code help define each of our organizational values. Because we might sometimes stray from our values it is important to be able to recognize what unacceptable behaviours are so that we can avoid these at all costs. These behaviours harm the workplace atmosphere and have a direct impact on productivity and employee well-being. Below is a list of examples of what to avoid:
- Attempting to cover up mistakes;
- Hiding information from management;
- Blaming others or previous regimes;
- Showing disrespect for diverse opinions or beliefs;
- Mistreating others;
- Abusing power;
- Tolerating abusive behaviour by others;
- Being cynical or aggressive;
- Showing favouritism, bias or preferential treatment;
- Placing personal or unit goals ahead of Government of Canada objectives;
- Allowing emotions to sway judgment;
- Participating in gossip;
- Bullying of any kind.
PART 2: Guidelines and Expectations of Conduct
This part of the Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard provides specific guidelines related to expected behaviours for certain circumstances. Although not exhaustive, it addresses many situations we face on a daily basis.
1. Care and Use of Government Property
Property, equipment, materials, vehicles or facilities purchased or leased by the Department are owned by the Government and, by extension, the people of Canada. They are to be used for official purposes only, unless we have received proper management authorization for any other use. In all cases, use must never be for outside business interests or for any other form of personal gain.
We are expected to account for and protect any government property and valuables under our control. If any item is lost, stolen or damaged, we must immediately report it to our supervisor. Unless we have received authorization by the delegated authority, we must return all government property received as part of our duties when we leave our position, or when we are requested to do so by a proper authority.
Government-issued credit card must be used for official DFO and Coast Guard business only. We are responsible for its use and for paying the invoice in a timely manner. Please refer to the Treasury Board Directive on Acquisition Cards and the DFO and Coast Guard Guidelines on Using Acquisition Cards.
Any knowledge, information or technology created at DFO and Coast Guard, or by departmental employees, to meet operational requirements, must be dealt with in accordance with the DFO and Coast Guard Intellectual Property Management Policy and Intellectual Property Management Guidelines.
2. Confidentiality and Use of Information
As DFO and Coast Guard employees we must comply with all legislation, directives and procedures relating to any personal or official information that are under the control of the Department.
We access official information only if authorized to do so and if it is required for work. Under no circumstances will we use this information for personal use, gain or financial benefit either for ourselves, our relatives or anyone else. We shall not destroy or change a record, make a false record or hide a record, nor ask or advise someone else to do so.
All information exchanged in the course of our duties must be gathered by legal means, be true and fair and not designed to mislead. During and after our employment we are required to keep in strict confidence all information we obtained about employees and clients to which the public does not have access. We disclose this type of information only if specifically authorized to do so by legislation or departmental guidelines or by a court of law. In social or public settings, we take care not to discuss confidential, personal or sensitive information.
We are required to use discretion at all times when conducting investigations or prosecuting.
When we leave the employment of the Department, we do not take with us or retain any official records or documents, including paper documents, electronic or digital information, videos, etc. unless authorized by the delegated authority.
3. Providing Testimony and Information
When called upon to testify in court proceedings or to provide information in the course of an investigation, judicial inquiry, fact finding, etc., we are required to do so in a full and forthright manner. We shall not knowingly provide false, misleading, or inaccurate information. We shall conduct ourselves honestly, ethically and with integrity. We will avoid speculation or personal opinions.
4. Electronic Networks Access and Use
See the Treasury Board Policy on the Use of Electronic Networks and the DFO’s Acceptable Use of Electronic Networks Policy.
DFO and Coast Guard’s electronic network supports a wealth of information and is a cost-effective tool for communications, service to the public, departmental visibility, gathering job-related information and much more. We must use the network effectively, and be cautious not to expose the Department or ourselves to potential harm.
The electronic network is for official use only. However, limited personal use of the network is permitted, provided it complies with all related legislation, policies and guidelines. This must not affect our productivity or that of our colleagues or impose a storage burden on computer systems. Examples of acceptable personal use during breaks and lunch time include limited online banking transactions, reading or writing personal emails or surfing the Web on acceptable sites.
Examples of unacceptable activity of the electronic network includes the use for private business, personal gain or profit, political activity, sending chain letters or abusive messages, etc. See DFO’s Acceptable Use Policy for Electronic Networks for further guidance.
Remember: access to the electronic network can always be traced back to the user.
5. Duty of LoyaltyFootnote 4
Freedom of expression is a deep-rooted value in our democratic system. It is entrenched in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and all Canadians, including federal public servants, enjoy this right.
At the same time, the Public Service of Canada is an important national institution, part of the essential framework of Canadian parliamentary democracy. Through the support we provide to the duly constituted government, public servants contribute in a fundamental way to good government, democracy and Canadian society.
As a result, we have unique responsibilities that are part of our conditions of employment. While our right to freedom of expression is protected in the Charter, as public servants, we are also required to be – and to be seen to be – objective and impartial in fulfilling our responsibilities, and to demonstrate loyalty to our employer, the Government of Canada.
Given these responsibilities, employment in the Public Service involves acceptance of certain restraints, one of the most important of which is the use of caution when it comes to making criticisms of the Government. While we are free to question policies, procedures or instructions, we should do so within the appropriate internal channels. When doing so, we must exercise caution in ensuring that our public statements have no impact on our ability – or the perception of our ability – to objectively and impartially perform our duties as a public servant.
As employees of DFO and Coast Guard, making certain public commentary or criticism, such as signing a petition or publicly speaking out against a policy, direction, position
or program of our Department, could bring into question the real or perceived ability to perform our official duties in a completely objective and impartial manner. Generally, the more closely our official duties and place of employment are related to the issue, the higher the risk that our objectivity and impartiality will be questioned.
When balancing our right to freedom of expression with the importance of our duty of loyalty to our employer and impartiality of the public service, we should consider the following:
- The nature of our official duties;
- The visibility of our position within the department and the public service as a whole;
- The object of the criticism or public statements (i.e. is it critical of a policy, direction or program of DFO and/or Coast Guard? Of another department?); and
- The impact of our action and/or criticism (i.e. could it question our impartiality or objectivity as a DFO and Coast Guard employee? As a public servant?).
In many circumstances, we can voice our opinions on government positions, policies or decisions. However, in certain circumstances, this balance may only be achieved by limiting our freedom of expression. We must consider these factors and exercise sound judgment before engaging in such activities.
For further guidance, refer to the TBS document entitled Duty of Loyalty.
6. Use of Social Networks
The Government of Canada actively endorses the use of social networks as a communications tool to reach and interact with its employees as well as the public.
However, we must bear in mind that social networks are public forums, and that comments and behaviours on these forums become part of the public record. As we are now more visible as public servants, we must always consider our organizational values (especially respect for democracy and respect for people) as well as our responsibilities under this Code when making statement on social networks sites.
Comments, criticisms, pictures, videos and personal information that we place on these sites are not private. We must be cautious of what is said and posted in light of our duty of loyalty, security of information, the reputation and professionalism of the Department and the government, and respect for colleagues.
7. Public Comments
As DFO and Coast Guard employees, our public comments can easily be seen by others as the voice of the Department. With this in mind, we cannot publicly comment on the Department’s position on any subject unless it is part of our official duties and that it complies with the Departmental National Media Relations and Spokesperson Policy.
When authorized, before making public comments, we must make every effort to obtain accurate information and facts by consulting with the proper colleagues and stakeholders to address sensitivities and not going outside the scope of our knowledge and expertise. We must avoid expressing personal opinions on DFO and/or Coast Guard policies and programs, limiting our public comments to factual information.
All media inquiries must be referred to the Communications Branch or Regional Communications.
8. Respect and Courtesy when Serving and Dealing with Clients
At DFO and Coast Guard, we are called upon to work with external and internal clients and stakeholders. While these situations may at times be difficult, we must remain professional and respectful, even under difficult conditions such as in times of personal stress and in the face of provocation. We must never make abusive, derisive, threatening, insulting, offensive or provocative statements or gestures to, or about, another person.
Similarly, we can expect to be treated with respect by our clients and stakeholders. In circumstances when this is not the case, and where appropriate, we can request the other party(ies) to remain respectful. In most cases, we can even postpone an interaction to a later time, when tempers have cooled.
When performing unwelcome activities, such as dealing with fisheries violations or explaining unpopular decisions, we are likely to experience difficult client relations from which we cannot withdraw. Training is available to increase conflict management skills for dealing effectively with difficult situations.
Please refer to PART 3, Section 7, Relationship / Partnership with External Stakeholders regarding to possible situations of conflict of interest when dealing with external stakeholders.
9. Off-duty Conduct
Off-duty conduct is usually considered a private matter. However, it could become a work-related matter if itFootnote 5:
- Harms DFO and/or Coast Guard's reputation or program;
- Renders us unable to perform our duties in a satisfactory manner;
- Leads other employees to refuse, be reluctant to or be unable to work with us;
- Renders us guilty of a serious breach of the Criminal Code of Canada and thus renders our conduct injurious to the general reputation of the Department and its employees. For example, the nature of criminal charges may be incompatible with the duties of a peace officer;
- Makes it difficult for the Department to manage its operations efficiently and/or to direct its workforce efficiently.
As Public Service employees, we must consider the impact of our actions even outside the hours of our employment. Off-duty activities may sometimes reflect on both the Department and the Government of Canada and affect the confidence and respect of the public.
Employees who are bound to the workplace for extended periods of time (i.e. on ships) will find that the line between “on-duty” and “off-duty” becomes blurred. In these circumstances, we should be mindful of the public perception of our actions; the public does not distinguish whether we are on-duty or off-duty.
10. Fishery OfficerFootnote 6 Conduct
As Fishery Officers we are and continue to be subject to the Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard in its entirety. The following standards of conduct are supplementary to all other expectationsFootnote 7 of behaviour already listed in this Code, and are intended to clearly articulate the additional standards that apply to Fishery Officers.
Fishery Officers carry out the Department’s enforcement mandate, and are a key contact group between the Department and the public. The professional and personal activities of Fishery Officers, as law enforcement / peace officers, reflect on the Department and the Government of Canada. As such, as Fishery Officers, we are expected to conduct ourselves at all times, both on and off duty, in a manner which will not discredit ourselves, the Department, or the Government of Canada.
In particular, as Fishery Officers, we shall:
- 10.1 Demonstrate the highest standard of observance of the laws, including those that we are accountable for enforcing, and refrain from engaging in conduct that may adversely affect, or be perceived to adversely affect, the performance of our duties and our dealings with other law enforcement agencies. We shall inform our supervisor without delay should we be arrested, detained, or charged with any criminal offence or for a violation of the laws that we are accountable for enforcing.
- 10.2 Not perform our duties under the influence of alcohol, cannabis or any other impairing substances, and not to consume alcohol, cannabis or any other impairing substances while in uniform, whether on duty or not, or while on duty, whether in uniform or not. The sole exception shall be that alcohol may be consumed at a special event when in ceremonial uniform with prior authorization by a fishery officer at least one rank senior to the most senior fishery officer attending the special event. Under no circumstances will impairment due to the consumption of alcoholic beverages or cannabis or any other impairing substances be tolerated. If we take any medication that may impair our ability to discharge our duties, we shall inform our supervisor prior to reporting for duty.
- 10.3 Take reasonable steps to avoid conflicts of interest, as defined for all employees in Part 3 of this Code. In particular, we shall:
- Not use our badge, title or authority to exert influence, to obtain for ourselves or grant any other person, group or organization preferential treatment;
- Not participate in commercial fishing or commercial sport fishing activities (see Part 3, Section 2.2 Commercial Activities Related to Fisheries); and
- Not retain any fish, materials, equipment and/or proceeds obtained or seized in the performance of our duties for our personal use, but always to lawfully dispose of any such goods.
PART 3: Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment
- Conflict of Interest:
A situation in which a public servantFootnote 8 has private interests that could improperly influence the performance of his or her official duties and responsibilities or in which a public servant uses his or her office for personal gain. A realconflict of interest exists at the present time, an apparent conflict of interest could be perceived by a reasonable observer to exist, whether or not it is the case, and a potential conflict of interest could reasonably be foreseen to exist in the future.
According to the Federal Court of Appeal in Threader,Footnote 9 the existence of an apparent conflict of interest must be determined by the following question: Would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically and having thought the matter through, think it more likely than not that the public servant, whether consciously or unconsciously, will be influenced in the performance of his official duties by considerations having to do with his private interests?
In the public service, the appearance and perception of a conflict of interest is as important to manage as a real conflict of interest.
- Conflict of duties:
A conflict that arises, not because of a public servant’s private interests, but as a result of one or more concurrent or competing official responsibilities. For example, these roles could include his or her primary public service employment and his or her responsibilities in an outside role that forms part of his or her official duties, such as an appointment to a board of directors, or other outside function.
- Third party:
Any individual, group, or organization external to the Government of Canada, such as a private individual, a business, a society, an association, or a university.
B) Prevention of conflict of interest
This section outlines the conflict of interest and post-employment requirements. These requirements are grounded in and serve to uphold our values. By upholding these ethical standards, we conserve and enhance public confidence in the honesty, fairness and integrity of the public service. These requirements also form part of Canada’s commitments as a signatory to international agreements on values and ethics.
We maintain public confidence in the objectivity of the public service by preventing and avoiding situations that could give the appearance of a conflict of interest, result in a potential for a conflict of interest or result in an actual conflict of interest. Conflict of interest does not relate exclusively to matters concerning financial transactions and the transfer of economic benefit. While financial activity is important, conflicts of interest in any area of activity can have a negative impact on the perceived objectivity of the public service. With the permanent and pervasive nature of information technology, public servants should be particularly sensitive to real, apparent or potential conflicts of interest that may arise from messages and information transmitted via the Internet and other media.
It is impossible to foresee every situation that could give rise to a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest. When in doubt, we should refer to the requirements set out in this Code to guide appropriate action. We can also seek guidance from our manager or the Workplace Well-Being.
In addition to the requirements outlined in this appendix, we are also required to observe any specific conduct requirements contained in the statutes governing our Department and our profession, where applicable.
Ultimately, each one of us is responsible for preventing, avoiding and mitigating our conflict of interest situations.
C) General Responsibilities and Duties
Our general responsibilities and duties include:
- Taking all possible steps to recognize, prevent, report, and resolve any real, apparent or potential conflicts of interest between our official responsibilities and any of our private affairs;
- Unless otherwise permitted in this Code, refraining from having private interests, which would be unduly affected by government actions in which we participate, or of which we have knowledge or information;
- Not knowingly taking advantage of, or benefiting from, information that is obtained in the course of our duties that is not available to the public;
- Refraining from the direct or indirect use of, or allowing the direct or indirect use of government property of any kind, including property leased to the government, for anything other than officially approved activities;
- Not assisting private entities or persons in their dealings with the government where this would result in preferential treatment of the entities or persons;
- Not interfering in the dealings of private entities or persons with the government in order to inappropriately influence the outcome;
- Maintaining the impartiality of the public service and not engaging in any outside or political activities that impair or could be seen to impair our ability to perform our duties in an objective or impartial manner; and
- Ensuring that any real, apparent or potential conflict that arises between our private activities and our official responsibilities as a public servant is resolved in the public interest.
D) Conflict of Interest During Employment
In order to prevent and deal with situations of conflict of interest during employment, we are required to report in writing to the Workplace Well-Being, using the DFO Conflict of Interest (COI) Declaration Form, all outside activities, assets and interests that might give rise to a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest in relation to our official duties. Such a report is to be made within 60 days of our initial appointment or any subsequent appointment, transfer or deployment. This must be done in consultation with our manager.
On a regular basis thereafter, and every time a major change occurs in our personal affairs or official duties, we are required to review our obligations under this Code. If a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest exists, we must complete and submit a DFO COI Declaration Form to the Workplace Well-Being in a timely manner.
When negotiating financial arrangements with outside parties, we are to comply with the requirements listed in this Code as well as other related directives or policies issued by the Treasury Board and DFO / Coast Guard. When in doubt, we are to immediately report the situation to our managers in order to seek advice or direction on how to proceed.
1. Personal Assets
We are required to evaluate our personal assets, taking into consideration the nature of our official duties and the characteristics of our assets. If there is any real, apparent or potential conflict of interest between the carrying out of our official duties and our assets, we are to report this matter to the Workplace Well-Being in a timely manner, using the DFO COI Declaration Form.
Where the Centre for Workplace Well-Being determines that any of these assets results in a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest in relation to our official duties, we may be required to divest those assets, or to take measures to resolve the conflict. We may not sell or transfer assets to family members or anyone else for the purpose of circumventing the compliance requirements.
The types of assets that should be reported and the procedures for reporting and managing such assets are set out in the Directive on Reporting and Managing Financial Conflicts of Interest.
For example, if we work in a section of DFO / Coast Guard where we are involved in developing policies that will affect the fishing industry and we own publicly-traded securities in that same industry, we need to report these assets for review by the Workplace Well-Being Values and Ethics Advisors, using the DFO & Coast Guard COI Declaration Form.
2. Outside Employment or Activities
We may engage in employment outside the public service and take part in outside activities unless the employment or activities are likely to give rise to a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest or would undermine the impartiality of the public service or our objectivity.
After discussing with our manager, we are required to complete and submit a DFO COI Declaration Form to the Workplace Well-Being when our outside employment or activities might subject us to demands incompatible with our official duties, or cast doubt on our ability to perform our duties or responsibilities in a completely objective manner. The Workplace Well-Being may require that the outside activities be modified or terminated if it is determined that a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest exists.
If we receive a benefit or income either directly or indirectly from a contract with the Government of Canada, we are required to report such contractual or other arrangements to the Workplace Well-Being. The Workplace Well-Being will determine whether the arrangement presents a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest, and may require that the contract be modified or terminated.
The outside activities listed below have significant risks of placing us in real, apparent or potential conflict of interest with respect to our official duties as employees of DFO and Coast Guard. If we participate in any of these activities we must discuss it with our manager and report it to the Workplace Well-Being for review, using the DFO COI Declaration Form.
2.1 DFO and Coast Guard Programs or Activities
- Applying for or receiving benefits under any grant, contribution, income assistance program, or any other program administered by DFO and/or Coast Guard, whether as an individual or as part of an organization that applies for or receives benefits.
- Being involved in an outside activity for an organization whose mandate is similar or contradictory to that of DFO and/or Coast Guard or who has dealings with our Department.
2.2 Commercial Activities Related to Fisheries
- Holding or using a commercial fishing license, including having financial interest in one, participating in commercial fishing or commercial sport fishing, holding a fisher’s registration card, trading fishing quotas or having any other personal involvement where we stand to receive a personal gain from commercial fishing.
During the assessment of this possible conflict of interest, the following criteria will be used to determine the nature of our duties and our visibility related to this activity:
- level of involvement in enforcement activities related to the fisheries;
- level of involvement in collecting data or samples related to the fisheries;
- level of involvement or influence in the decision-making process related to the setting of fishing allocations and other management measures; and/or
- level of involvement in licensing decisions or policies.
2.3 Boards of Directors
- Being a member of a board of directors of an organization, society or association, whether it is part of our official duties or our private interests, could pose a potential risk of conflict of interest if the mandate of the organization is similar or contradictory to that of DFO and/or Coast Guard or if the entity has dealings with the Department.
If we are involved in an external board of directors we must consult the DFO Boards of Directors Assessment Tool and follow the requirements set out in its Decision Tree. We must ensure that concurrent outside appointments, such as to a board of directors, are managed appropriately and that any resulting conflicts of duties are resolved in the public interest.
For example, the Decision Tree identifies that where there is no link with our official duties, as in the case of membership in the board of directors of a condo association or a parent-teacher association, no risk of conflict of interest arises.
3. Political Activities
Part 7 of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) recognizes our right, as public servants, to engage in political activity so long as it does not impair, or is not perceived to impair, our ability to perform our duties in a politically impartial manner.
“Political activities” are defined in Part 7 of the PSEA as:
- any activity in support of, within or in opposition to a political party;
- carrying on any activity in support of or in opposition to a candidate before or during an election period; or,
- seeking nomination as or being a candidate in an election before or during the election period.
If we wish to engage in a political activity not covered by Part 7 of the PSEA that could constitute a conflict of interest, we are required to report the proposed activity to the Workplace Well-Being. Similarly, if we are subject to this Code but not subject to Part 7 of the PSEA, including casual and part-time workers, and wish to engage in any political activity that could constitute a conflict of interest, we are to report the proposed activity to the Workplace Well-Being.
Examples of non-candidacy political activities are: going door-to-door to solicit votes for a candidate or party, putting a sign on your front lawn supporting a candidate or party, donating to a political candidate or party, etc. While in uniform, we shall not attend political gatherings or participate in any political activity. For further examples and guidance, please consult the Public Service Commission’s webpage on non-candidacy political activities.
If we are considering involvement in non-candidacy political activities, we should seek advice from our manager or the Workplace Well-Being who is the Designated Departmental Official for Political Activities before acting. We should also refer to the Public Service Commission’s webpage on political activities.
We are required to seek and obtain permission from the Public Service Commission to be a candidate, or seeking to be nominated as one, in a federal, provincial, territorial, or municipal election, in accordance with Part 7 of the PSEA. We should seek assistance from the Workplace Well-Being who is the Designated Departmental Official for Political Activities. We should also refer to the Public Service Commission's webpage on the Candidacy Process.
3.3 Holding a Position of Office in and/or Volunteering for Aboriginal Band Councils
Holding a position of office and/or volunteering in an Aboriginal band council is not considered a political activity under Part 7 of the PSEA. However, given the mandate of our Department, there may be instances when these types of outside activities could place us in a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest. If we participate in any of these activities we must discuss it with our manager and if this participation could place us in a situation of real, apparent or potential conflict of interest, we must report it to the Workplace Well-Being for review, using the DFO COI Declaration Form.
The nature of our position (i.e. regulatory role, visibility, decision-making power, extent and nature of dealings with the Aboriginal band, area of work coverage, etc.) will be key in the assessment of whether or not there is a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest between our official duties and these outside activities.
4. Gifts, Hospitality and Other Benefits
We are expected to use our best judgment to avoid situations of real, apparent or potential conflict of interest by considering the following criteria on gifts, hospitality and other benefits and in keeping with the overall context of this Code.
We must not accept any gifts, hospitality or other benefits that may have a real, apparent or potential influence on our objectivity in carrying out our official duties and responsibilities or that may place us under obligation to the donor. This includes activities such as free or discounted admission to sporting and cultural events, travel or conferences.
Although the normal expectation is that we do not accept gifts, hospitality or other benefits, it is permissible:
- If they are infrequent and of minimal value;
- If they are within the normal standards of courtesy or protocol;
- If they arise out of activities or events related to our official duties; and
- If they do not compromise or appear to compromise our integrity or that of our Department.
Soliciting or accepting a commission, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind from a person who has dealings with the Government, without obtaining the required written consent, is an offence under the Criminal Code as well as a serious breach of this Code. This could be interpreted as a bribe.
For further information on the acceptance of gifts, please consult the Departmental Guidelines on the Acceptance and Solicitation of Gifts, Hospitality and Other Benefits.
4.2 Situations Where it May be Impossible to Decline a Gift, Hospitality or Other Benefit
We are to seek written direction from the Workplace Well-Being where it is impossible to decline gifts, hospitality or other benefits that do not meet the principles set out above, or where it is believed that there is sufficient benefit to DFO and/or Coast Guard to warrant acceptance of certain types of hospitality. The DFO & Coast Guard COI Declaration Form may be used for this purpose and sent to the Workplace Well-Being Values and Ethics Advisors for review.
When we participate in events (speaker at a conference, panel, etc.) in our official capacity, we do not accept any form of honorarium, regardless of whether such participation was during work hours or not.
4.4 Travel offers from a third party
In the course of our duties, we may receive offers from stakeholders to cover travel-related costs when we are called upon to collaborate with them or are invited to a conference as a speaker or guest.
If a third party offers to pay or reimburse the costs related to our travel, we must assess whether the offer poses a risk of real, apparent, or potential conflict of interest, or may have, or give the appearance of having, influence on our objectivity in carrying out our official duties. We must also ensure that the acceptance of the offer would not contravene any legal, financial or policy requirements. Accepting any offer of funded travel from a third party is unacceptable when:
- it would result in a direct personal benefit from the third party;
- the offer of funded travel was solicited;
- the third party is a potential or current supplier to the Department;
- the third party actively lobbies the Department; or
- the third party receives grants or contributionsFootnote 10 from the Department, unless a cost-sharing agreement exists between the Department and the organization and where this type of expense is part of the agreement.
If management decides that there is a benefit to, and a value added for, the Department in our attending such an event, a departmental source funding should be identified to cover the cost of the travel.
5. Solicitation and fundraising
With the exception of fundraising for officially supported activities as the Government of Canada Workplace Charitable Campaign (GCWCC), we may not solicit gifts, hospitality, other benefits or transfers of economic value from a person, group or organization in the private sector who has dealings with the government. When fundraising for such official activities we should ensure that we have prior written authorization from our Regional Director General (RDG), Assistant Commissioner (AC), Assistant Deputy Minister (ADM) or Deputy Commissioner (DC) to solicit donations, prizes or contributions in kind from external organizations or individuals.
Similarly, if an outside individual or entity, with whom DFO and/or Coast Guard has past, present or potential official dealings, offers a benefit to the Department such as funding for an event or a donation of equipment, we are to consider whether any real, apparent or potential conflict of interest exists, and obtain the consent in writing of our RDG, AC, ADM or DC prior to accepting any such benefit. Consent will be provided in consultation with the Workplace Well-Being, as the delegated authority to provide direction as to whether gifts, hospitality are to be declined or retained by the department, donated to charity, or disposed of.
Our RDG, AC, ADM or DC may require that the activities be modified or terminated where it is determined that there is a real, potential or apparent conflict of interest or an obligation to the donor. These provisions are designed to ensure that this Code is consistent with paragraph 121(1) (c) of the Criminal Code of Canada.
At DFO and Coast Guard, we must consult the Departmental Guidelines on Fundraising and Solicitation in the Workplace for acceptable related activities and conduct.
6. Avoidance of preferential treatment
We are responsible for demonstrating objectivity and impartiality in the exercise of our duties and in our decision-making, whether related to staffing, financial awards or penalties to external parties, transfer payments, program operations or any other exercise of responsibility.
This means that we are prohibited from granting preferential treatment or advantages to family, friends or any other person or entity. We are not to offer extraordinary assistance to any entity or persons already dealing with the government without informing our supervisor and obtaining their support. We also are not to disadvantage any entity or persons dealing with the government because of personal antagonism or bias.
Providing information that is publicly accessible is not considered preferential treatment.
For example, while it is acceptable to mentor someone regarding general principles in staffing when we are not part of the staffing process, we cannot provide someone with information not generally available to others. We must inform our supervisor for a file that involves a person or entity with which we have a personal relationship (i.e. contract, recruitment, transfer payment, collaboration, etc.) and we must not be responsible for such a file.
We must never use our official identification, title or authority to obtain personal benefit, to exert influence, to obtain or appear to obtain any privilege, favour for ourselves or others, or to do anything that is illegal, improper or against the best interests of the public we serve or the Department. This would be a clear abuse of authority.
7. Relationship/Partnership with External Stakeholders
As public servants, we are called upon to have dealings with a variety of stakeholders. It is important to be, and be perceived as being, impartial and objective in all our dealings with our stakeholders, and to remember that we represent the Department and the Government of Canada. Care must be taken to keep our relationships with stakeholders professional and to avoid any real, apparent or potential conflict of interest, especially if these become recurring and longstanding.
In a number of small communities, DFO and Coast Guard form a visible and significant part of the community. In such cases, it may be a greater challenge for us to keep our professional and personal lives separate. Maintaining our professional demeanour in public fora and assessing the impact of our personal behaviour on our professional duties becomes especially important in these circumstances.
Consultation and Negotiation
In our role as public servants we are often called upon to manage and participate in consultations with diverse stakeholders, either bilaterally or in multi-stakeholder fora.
- It is important to remain clear and impartial in our role as departmental representatives, in spite of ongoing pressure to 'advocate' for stakeholders.
- It is important to understand the purpose of the consultation, the limitations and flexibilities within the issue, and the objectives of the department. Consultations can vary from providing information or seeking advice up to significant engagement.
- As managers, it is important to ensure that our employees are equipped to manage or participate in difficult discussions.
There are occasions when, as public servants, we are called upon to be negotiators, with other levels of government, First Nations and other stakeholders:
- A negotiator must understand the mandate, including its limitations and flexibilities.
- A mandate must have the required level of approval.
- For managers, it is important to ensure that our employees are equipped with the skills and mandate required for the negotiation.
8. Reporting Relationships
Given that as supervisors we are expected to be unbiased and fair in managing our team, a reporting relationship between family members is a real conflict of interest and should be avoided since it creates the appearance of preferential treatment. The closeness and visibility of the relationship are considered factors in determining the extent to which the definition of family may be applied. For instance, close personal relationships that may not satisfy the legal definition of family but may contribute to a perception of preferential treatment should also be avoided in reporting relationships.
It is our responsibility to identify situations where we may be in a situation of potential conflict of interest and to take appropriate avoidance measures. In cases where it is impossible to avoid the conflict of interest, management should consult with the Workplace Well-Being to assign certain management responsibilities regarding the reporting employee (performance assessment, leave approval, financial approvals, etc.) to another supervisor, or take other administrative measures to address the conflict of interest.
E) Conflict of Interest Before and After Leaving Employment
This section contains requirements for preventing post-employment conflict of interest situations before and after leaving the Department.
We all have a responsibility to minimize the possibility of real, apparent or potential conflict of interest between our most recent responsibilities within the federal public service and our subsequent employment outside the public service.
The sole fact of rehiring a former public servant does not necessarily present a conflict of interest. In fact, in some cases, it might be the most cost-efficient way of dealing with short-term or specific recruitment needs. However, management should ensure good human resources planning, avoid preferential treatment, and respect policies and guidelines.
Before leaving our employment with the public service, we all are to disclose our intentions regarding any future outside employment or activities that may pose a risk of real, apparent or potential conflict of interest with our current responsibilities and discuss potential conflicts of interests with our manager or the Workplace Well-Being.
For example, if in our current duties, we have significant dealings with an outside stakeholder, it is important not to benefit or seem to benefit from that relationship in order to obtain future employment.
1. Post-Employment Limitation Period When in Designated Positions
At DFO and Coast Guard, all executive (EX) positions are designated for post-employment limitation. In addition, the Deputy Minister is responsible for designating positions of risk for post-employment conflict of interest situations. Such designations are to be communicated to potential and current employees.
If we occupy these designated positions, we are subject to a one-year limitation period after leaving employment with the federal public service. Before leaving and during this one-year limitation period, we are to report to the Workplace Well-Being all firm offers of employment or proposed activity outside the public service that could place us in a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest with our public service employment. We are also immediately to disclose the acceptance of any such offer.
In addition, we may not, during this one-year period after leaving the federal public service, without the authorization of the Deputy Minister via the Workplace Well-Being:
- Accept appointment to a board of directors of, or employment with, private entities with which we had significant official dealings during the period of one year immediately prior to the termination of our service. The official dealings in question may either be directly on our part or through our subordinates;
- Make representations to any government organization on behalf of persons or entities outside of the public service with which we had significant official dealings, during the period of one year immediately prior to the termination of our service.Footnote 11 The official dealings in question may either be directly on our part or through our subordinates; or
- Give advice to our clients or employer using information that is not publicly available concerning the programs or policies of the departments or organizations with which we were employed or with which we had a direct and substantial relationship.
2. Waiver or Reduction of Limitation Period
We may apply to the Workplace Well-Being for a written waiver or reduction of the post-employment limitation period. To do so, we are to provide sufficient information to the Workplace Well-Being to assist the Deputy Minister in making a determination as to whether to grant the waiver taking into consideration the following criteria:
- the circumstances under which the termination of services occurred;
- our general employment prospects;
- the significance to the government of information we possessed by virtue of our position in the public service;
- the desirability of a rapid transfer of our knowledge and skills from the government to private, other governmental or non-governmental sectors;
- the degree to which the new employer might gain unfair commercial or private advantage by hiring us;
- the authority and influence we possessed while in the public service; and/or
- any other consideration at the discretion of the Deputy Minister.
PART 4: Resolution of Values and Ethics Issues
The guidelines set out in this Code are not intended to respond to every possible ethical issue that might arise in the course of our daily work. When these issues arise, we are encouraged to discuss and resolve these matters with our manager in a timely manner. We can also seek advice and support from the Workplace Well-Being.
We are all expected to resolve issues in a fair, respectful and timely manner and consider informal processes such as dialogue or mediation. If necessary, formal recourse such as grievances may also be used.
As provided by Sections 12 and 13 of the Public Service Disclosure Protection Act (PSDPA), if we have information that could indicate a serious breach of this Code, we can bring this matter to our immediate supervisor, the Departmental Senior Officer for Disclosure, or the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner.
When faced with an ethical dilemma, the following decision-making steps can assist us in determining an appropriate course of action. We should ask ourselves the following questions:
- What is difficult about this situation?
- Is what I want to do legal and consistent with guidelines, policies and this Code?
- Is what I want to do consistent with our Departmental values?
- What are the consequences and impacts of the possible actions and decisions? Do they in any way impact my ability, real or perceived, to do my job effectively and impartially?
- Have I asked for advice from an independent, trusted person or service?
- How would the media, my management or the general public perceive the situation if my actions were reported on the front page of a newspaper?
- Am I comfortable with the decision I am about to make?
Although this Code sets standards of behaviour for all employees of DFO and Coast Guard, they are not all-inclusive. The absence of a specific standard of behaviour does not mean that an action is condoned and consequently it may still be subject to disciplinary measures up to and including termination of employment.
Always remember that you are responsible for your choices and actions.
PART 5: A Word from our Values and Ethics Champions
When each of us decides to pursue a life of public service, we likely do so because certain values are important to us – we want to be part of an organization where values such as respect for democracy, respect for people, integrity, stewardship, excellence and service to the public good are a central and constant element in all that we do.
The Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard is, first and foremost, a tangible expression of the principles that we, as employees of the Department, hold close to our hearts. It is our vehicle for telling the world who we are as our best selves and what we stand for.
Many of you contributed enthusiastically to the development of the Code, a welcome sign that values and ethics truly are part of our everyday thoughts and discourse here at DFO and Coast Guard. The Code is meant to inspire you further, and to support us all in setting high standards for ourselves and for the relationships we have with others as we deliver results for Canadians.
As your departmental Champions for Values and Ethics, we encourage you to view this Code as an essential tool to help and guide you and we encourage you to think of the Code as a “living document”, one that you can talk about with your colleagues, supervisor and manager.
Departmental Values and Ethics Champions
PART 6: Resources and contacts
Values and Ethics
Any questions we should have related to this Code, we can discuss them with our manager or supervisor. For additional guidance concerning this Code, we are to contact the Workplace Well-Being Values and Ethics advisors at 1-877-213-6272 or send an email message to Workplace Well-Being.
Informal Conflict Management Services
Conflict management provides employees and managers with a confidential, neutral forum in which to discuss and resolve workplace conflicts before initiating a formal process, or after putting a formal process on hold to attempt to resolve the conflict informally. If we require assistance, we may find and contact our regional Conflict Management Practitioner, or contact the ICMS Office for general information.
Disclosure of Wrongdoing
The senior officer for disclosure of wrongdoing helps promote a positive environment for disclosing wrongdoing and deals with disclosures of wrongdoing made by public servants of their organization. The senior officer for disclosure is responsible for supporting the Deputy Minister in meeting the requirements of the PSDPA. For information or to make a disclosure please consult the Workplace Well-Being website for internal disclosures, or contact the Senior officer for Disclosures at 1-866-211-4411 or by email at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Employee Assistance Program
If we find ourselves in a challenging personal situation (i.e. difficulty managing your time, health issues, substance abuse, relationship issues, etc.) that could affect our professional relationships or performance at work, it is important to speak to our manager or other advisors.
To help overcome personal challenges, we have access to the Employee Assistance Program.
Assistance is also available from our human resources advisors and our union representatives.
PART 7: Reference Documents
The following is a list of references that relate to the Values and Ethics Code for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard. It is by no means exhaustive, but it includes the most relevant material.
Acts and Laws
- Access to Information Act
- Canada Labour Code
- Criminal Code of Canada
- Financial Administration Act
- Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act
- Public Service Employment Act
- Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act
- Privacy Act
- Lobbying Act
Treasury Board Policies and Directives
- Directive on Acquisition Cards
- Policy on Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment
- Policy on Transfer Payments
- Policy on the Use of Electronic Networks
- Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector
- Communications Policy of the Government of Canada
DFO & Coast Guard Policies and Guidelines
- Workplace Well-Being
- Boards of Directors Assessment Tool and Decision Tree
- Employee Assistance Program
- Guidelines on Investigations of Breaches of the Fishery Officer Code of Conduct
- Guidelines on the Acceptance and Solicitation of Gifts, Hospitality and Other Benefits
- Guidelines on Fundraising and Solicitation in the Workplace
- DFO’s Acceptable Use Policy for Electronic Networks
- Intellectual Property Management Guidelines
- Intellectual Property Management Policy
- Using Acquisition Cards (Finance and Administration 101)
- National Media Relations and Spokesperson Policy
- DFO COI Declaration Form
- Duty of Loyalty
- Effective behaviours
- International agreements on values and ethics
- PSC's Non-candidacy Political Activities Website
- PSC’s Political Activities Website
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: