|
The information in this document was compiled by Small Craft Harbours (SCH) of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) in response to requests from Harbour Authorities for assistance in their fee collection efforts. It is a cooperative effort amongst SCH Headquarters, SCH Regions, Harbour Authority Advisory Councils, and individual Harbour Authorities across the country to promote a dialogue on this issue.
|
|
Section |
Title |
Description |
| 1 | Introduction | Describes the ultimate purpose of the document, and the process of gathering, evaluating and distributing possible ideas. |
| 2 | The REAL Problem | Outlines some of the real issues which make fee collection difficult for Harbour Authorities. |
| 3 | General Tips |
Discusses a number of possible fee collection strategies, many of which are already successfully used by Harbour Authorities. |
| 4 | Strict Policies | Discusses the need for developing and following strict policies related to fee collection. |
| 5 | Payment Options | Discusses the use of various fee payment options. |
| 6 | Other Ideas | Discusses additional options for fee collection. |
| 7 | Ideas Requiring Caution | Discusses some fee collection strategies that, at minimum, should be used with extreme care. |
| 8 | Ideas to Avoid | Discusses some fee collection strategies that really should be avoided at all costs. |
| 9 | Sample Documents | Includes copies of documents (berthage agreements, collection policies, invoice letters and notices) which can serve as models for Harbour Authorities. |
Survey Questionnaire: Collecting User Fees
|
Further, telephone interviews were conducted based on this survey
during the same time period, and much valuable information was obtained.
The need for this document was also reaffirmed.
"I feel this is a very worthwhile subject and that all HA's could
benefit from learning more on collecting user fees."
Harbour Authority - Pacific Region
"I would be greatly interested in learning more about this subject.
As a new Harbour Supervisor -- still in the learning process - any
information that would help me would be greatly appreciated."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
Contributions and suggestions received from the following stakeholders
have been incorporated into the latest version of the document:
For most people, ensuring fee collection and pursuing delinquent
accounts is an unpleasant task. It is easy to ignore the situation, or
delay action until there is a serious problem involving considerable
sums of money. Prompt action can lead to prompt results, or, at least,
can prevent larger problems.
|
Months Past Due |
Probability of Collecting |
| 3 Months | 69.6% |
| 6 Months | 52.1% |
| 12 Months | 22.8% |
Source: Commercial Collection
Agency Association:
Surveys show that the probability of collecting a delinquent account
drops dramatically with the length of delinquency. Harbour Authorities
should not set the precedent that non-payment for extended periods of
time is acceptable, by not contacting users about non-payment.
"Over the years I have noticed that if management tries to be too
accommodating to a problem user, the situation usually escalates out of
control and in the end you still have to enforce harbour policies. By
avoiding the situation you only made a bad situation worse. Don't bury
your head in the sand!"
Harbour Authority - Pacific Region
It is rather simple to ignore a letter in the mail or to avoid a
telephone call. A person at the harbour in an official capacity,
especially at fee payment time, could be an effective incentive to pay.
The Harbour Authority members should be an accessible presence at the
harbour and on the docks, people who should know the harbour users, talk
to them and cultivate friendships. Personal reminders about payments and
acknowledgement for payments may help in fee collection.
It is a matter of public relations and business-client relations. As one
Harbour Authority told us, in all circumstances, it is important to
respect the harbour users.
Generally, [we].... experience very little problem collecting fees.
This can be attributed to good communication to the harbour users
advising them of harbour rate structure through methods such as quotes,
dock orders delivered to vessels upon arrival, and by contacting the
user by phone to encourage an advance rate, which is a monetary savings
for them".
Harbour Authority - Pacific Region
Harbour Authorities that are well-run and follow good business practices
generally have less difficulty collecting fees. Holding regular
elections, seeking member input, transparency of operations and
finances, and good financial controls are all examples of good business
practices.
"Users are more likely to pay their fees when they feel that they are
contributing to a reputable organization that is well managed and
providing services that are valued at the community level".
Newfoundland and Labrador Region
If the Harbour Authority does not press delinquent users for fee
payment, the harbour users may not think that the Harbour Authority
really needs the money. Payments for services are the primary funding
source for most Harbour Authorities. The funds are essential for
operating the harbour, an important part of any community. Harbour users
who understand these facts may be more diligent about making payments on
time.
"Convince users of the importance of paying, as it allows them to
have some important services."
Harbour Authority - Québec Region
The Harbour Authority can post general reminders about fee payment due dates, perhaps in local stores. General notices can be left on the boats themselves.
It is best for Harbour Authorities to send out the bills for the season when they know the harbour users will be able to pay, such as near the beginning of the fishing season. When invoices can be processed as soon as possible, clients will perhaps receive them early enough to better budget for payment.
It is often tempting to be lenient with the client, who is probably well known to the Harbour Authority members. Avoid this, since the issue will need to be addressed eventually. Showing empathy for the client having problems is appropriate, but it should be stated that payment is expected as soon as possible. When possible, someone involved with the Harbour Authority who is less well known to the client can make contact regarding fees. This person should be courteous, but direct. Telephone calls should begin by stating that the call is on behalf of the Harbour Authority. Also, the discussion should centre on the outstanding bill, not the debtor. Finally, citing an existing Harbour Authority policy can de-personalize the situation.
It is important to quickly understand the reason for non-payment. The inability to pay is the common reason, of course. Yet, non-payment may be deliberate, being connected to unresolved matters, such as the quality of service, price, or other business-related dispute. If disputed matters can be resolved quickly and satisfactorily, payments will then be made. In the meantime, partial payment can be requested, with the remainder to be paid upon resolution of the situation.
Asking the right questions on the telephone or in person can make fee
collection more successful. Here are some tips:
The Harbour Authority should remain persistent, sending out bills and
invoices, even if it may seem that payment is becoming less and less
likely. This will show that the Harbour Authority takes fee collection
seriously, which may have a positive impact on other users.
"When we first started in 1998 we did have problems with collections
of fees, as fishers forgot to pay or felt that they shouldn't have to
pay, but our board stayed by the messages given by Small Craft Harbours
and tried collecting by second notices and then letters of not being
able to use the facilities. We received most of our money that year; I
think only five never paid and they have never been back to our
facilities."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
Obviously, it is important to obtain as much contact information as
possible from harbour users, in case you need to track them down for
non-payment. Obtaining this information is much harder after a problem
occurs. Detailed contact information would also be required in an
emergency, so the request can be framed in those terms.
Also, if the prospective harbour user is reluctant to provide details
during the information gathering stage, this can be a warning sign of
possible future problems. Do follow up if you are in doubt about
information provided.
"For [our harbour]..., I open a file for all those who request a
service. They thus sign a registration document and I hand them a
general copy of our regulations."
Harbour Authority - Québec Region
It is essential that Harbour Authorities have harbour users sign a
detailed user agreement, which outlines the collection policy of the
Harbour Authority. The customer should clearly understand what the
potential additional charges will be for late payment. This contractual
agreement will empower Harbour Authorities to take specific actions to
collect on delinquent accounts.
See 5.5 Link Payments to Services
See 9.1 Berthage Agreements
"All moorage agreements issued by HA's should be as common a document
as possible, with similar clauses for non payment, indemnification,
seizure and sale."
Harbour Authority - Pacific Region
It is essential that Harbour Authorities develop and follow an Accounts
Receivable Policy. Accounts receivables should be kept up-to-date and
continually reviewed, so that overdue accounts are identified and
collection efforts are initiated as soon as possible. Accurate
record-keeping will help the Harbour Authority determine each client's
reliability in paying.
Accurate records should be kept for payments, too. The worst thing would
be to hire a collection agency when the bill really was paid!
Many Harbour Authorities do not have a collection policy. However,
developing and following a detailed, written collection policy can bring
desired results. The collection policy should be made known to all and
should be strictly and consistently followed. Alternatively, once the
Harbour Authority gets the reputation of being lax in collecting money
owed, it will become more and more difficult to collect from harbour
users.
See 9.3 Collections and Operational Policies
See 9.4 Invoice Letters
See 9.5 Notice Letters
"[Our board]... implemented a strong harbour policy and procedure
document governing harbour fees and collections. By being consistent
with the enforcement of these rules & regulations harbour users
eventually get on board or tend to relocate their vessel to a harbour
where the environment best suited to their needs. [The Harbour
Authority]... maintains the harbour premises in an aesthetically
pleasing manner, management deals with situations in fair and practical
manner and is consistent with the enforcement of all rules and
regulations."
Harbour Authority - Pacific Region
"These steps can take the following form:
Harbour Authorities should take the first and every opportunity to
inform clients of its payment and collection policies, which will lessen
fee collection problems, especially with harbour users from outside the
community. Harbour Authority volunteers should be prepared to explain
the policies clearly and accurately. Providing the customers with
written policies is an effective method to eliminate misunderstandings.
These policies should also be printed on all Harbour Authority
statements and invoices. Policies can even be displayed in obvious
places at the harbour site.
A Harbour Authority in the Pacific Region has a secure "Honour Box", whereby fishers can pay moorage fees even when staff or volunteers are unavailable. Where possible, accepting cash, cheques, and the use of bank cards and major credit cards can make payment more convenient for users.
Demanding advance payment eliminates unpaid fees from the outset. A
discount can be offered to users who pay in advance, as this practice
would save time and money for all parties.
At minimum, Harbour Authorities can insist that future mooring and other
services will require that delinquent harbour users pay in full their
outstanding balances and henceforth pay cash in advance.
At one Harbour Authority in the Pacific Region, if a harbour user does not pay within three months, they begin charging the higher daily fee rate. Others add a $25 additional fee or a 15% "management fee" (with a minimum service charge) if the bill is not paid on time. For users who are capable of paying, these are incentives to pay on time.
Being flexible in terms of payment options could be a solution for individual harbour users. Incremental payments are one option, if necessary, in individual cases. However, it is important to use this option carefully. Too many clients paying by increments will diminish cash flow for the Harbour Authority, and may establish precedents that undermine existing collection policies and the perceived fairness of the payment system amongst harbour users.
The Harbour Authority can make access to its services conditional to
fees being paid. For example, one Harbour Authority in the Maritimes
Region, which owns its own fuel system, ties access to fuel to payment
of berthing and other fees. In this case, it is mandatory to use the
harbour authority-owned fuel system.
Denial of other services (wharfage, parking or roadway access, storage
space, and hydro) has met with a great deal of success. At another
Harbour Authority, also in the Maritimes, wharf space for lobster
equipment is denied if the user hasn't paid fees by the beginning of the
season.
DFO Legal Services was consulted on whether or not Harbour Authorities
can legally refuse access to a user. According to the opinion received,
keeping the harbour publicly accessible is one of the obligations
imposed on Harbour Authorities in the General Lease and through Section
6 of the Fishing and Recreational Harbours Act. Nevertheless, a
well-written berthage agreement ("License") between a Harbour Authority
and a user, which contains a specific "temination clause", or "payment
as a condition clause", will take precedence in these situations. By not
paying their fees, it would be the users who are defaulting on a
condition of this "license", and thereby restricting their own rights to
access.
Nevertheless, it is recommended that each Harbour Authority seek
independent legal council for clarity on specific situations.
Since it is sometimes more difficult to collect from transient users,
some Harbour Authorities charge them a higher rate, to better cover the
overall risk.
Also, some Harbour Authorities only offer short-term berthage in the
off-season to transient recreational users, to free up spaces for
longer-term berthage when the fishing season begins (fishing users often
pay more consistently).
Instead of having the fishers pay for services rendered, an arrangement
could be made so that the fish buyer, processor or factory will take the
harbour fee out of their payment to fishers, which would be much easier
for all involved. The fishers would not need to have the money up-front,
and payment will occur as soon as catch revenues are available to the
fishers.
The receipts for the amounts can even be sent to the company, to
distribute to the fishers. The effort to set up such an arrangement will
be worthwhile, as payments will be on time and collection efforts will
be unnecessary.
"In 1999 we developed a agreement to be signed between the fishers
and the Harbour Authority that allowed the companies that the fishers
sold to deduct from their fish earnings the Harbour Authority fees and
forward them to us. Almost 99% of the fishers sign this agreement before
they start fishing and we send the invoice in about 30 days after
fishing starts."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
See 9.2 Third Party Payment Agreement
"Instead of making fishers pay for services rendered, we thought of
having the purchaser or processor or factory, etc., pay us, which is
easier."
Harbour Authority - Québec Region
"The harbours must have a united front in apprehending these vessels.
These vessels and owners must not be allowed to get away without
paying."
Tidal Currents, October 2003
Overdue harbour user accounts can be sent to a professional collection
agency. However, there are costs associated with this. The collection
agency will keep a portion of the amounts collected, or charge a fixed
fee, if the amount is rather small. This can save the Harbour Authority
staff and volunteer time. One Harbour Authority suggested hiring a
collector for all the harbours in a Region. Some people warn, however,
that using a third party to collect the funds could generate ill-will.
"The best way we have found to collect over due accounts, is to put
them into the collection agency."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
"The Board discussed using a collection agency and felt that the
percentage charged of what is collected was too high. The possibility of
[only] collecting minimum payments was also likely."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
A single letter sent through a lawyer may be more effective than several
sent by the Harbour Authority to non-paying harbour users. Going through
a law office may be more expensive than a collection agency.
"The Board felt the best option was to go through a law firm, who
would deal with all details and procedures. The Harbour Supervisor faxed
the law firm a list of the delinquent accounts with mailing addresses,
the dates, and reasons for the charges. In most cases, as soon as the
customers received the first step of court action, the accounts were
settled plus costs. These costs were included in the first step of court
action papers from the law firm. By the second step of court action, all
accounts were settled. The customers were charged the court costs of
each step of action, so the longer they delayed paying, the more it cost
them.
Letters had been sent to these customers before this action was taken to
give them an opportunity to pay. A few did settle their accounts
beforehand, but there were approximately twenty accounts turned over to
the law firm. Most customers settle their accounts throughout the
season, but we have a couple who are possibly looking at similar action
next year. However, this number is reduced from twenty accounts to a
couple of accounts."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
Harbour Authorities can consider initiating an action in Small Claims
Court to obtain delinquent harbour fees. In some circumstances, the
wages of fishermen have been garnished. However, other Harbour
Authorities find this option expensive and ineffective.
"The Board felt by using Provincial Small Claims Court, it would mean
one of the Board members or the Harbour Supervisor would have to be
available to go to court. Someone would have to be able to travel to ...
(one hour drive each way) to have the court clerk sign the necessary
forms. Once a court date was set and the Harbour Authority
representative travelled ... for court, it could still be cancelled for
some reason by the customer and process would have to be done again."
Harbour Authority - Newfoundland Region
Some Harbour Authorities post the names of paid users publicly in order to put pressure on non-paid harbour users to settle their accounts. However, never directly single out a delinquent harbour user to cause embarrassment or to ruin a reputation. This can become a liability issue.
Work for the Harbour Authority in lieu of monetary payment has proven successful in individual cases. However, this can also become a liability issue. Also, in terms of equity, not all harbour users can be offered this option.
Clients, for whom fee payment has been a past problem, will likely continue their non-paying ways. As such, a Harbour Authority may share information on delinquent users to forewarn other Harbour Authorities about potential business problems at their own harbour. However, creating a registry of users who do not pay, shared through e-mail or telephone, could possible damage the reputation of users. Caution is necessary.
A bailiff can be contacted in response to long periods of
non-payment. Before anything is done, the boat should be surveyed, to
make a value assessment of the condition of the vessel. A third party
(namely, the bailiff) should be in attendance. The boat may be seized
and sold through the bailiff if the owner cannot be found.
"One method applied in dealing with extremely overdue account is that
...[the Harbour Authority]... has implemented a bailiff service to seize
the vessel. Inevitably this facilitates attention from the owner and
usually gets the account paid."
Harbour Authority - Pacific Region
Please note that while some Harbour Authorities in the Pacific Region
have cautiously used this strategy with some success, lawyers for the
Central & Arctic Region have instructed Harbour Authorities to avoid
boat seizures. The difference may be due to differing provincial
legislation.
It is best to obtain a legal opinion for your jurisdiction prior to
using this strategy.
Some Harbour Authorities will inform the Canadian Credit Bureau if
harbour users do not pay their fees. This will be a serious strike
against their credit rating, which will prevent them from other
borrowing. This would be a significant liability for fishers, who often
borrow as part of their regular business practices. Given the
seriousness of this possible strategy, it should be carefully weighed
and should only be used in extreme circumstances.
Given the seriousness of this possible strategy, it should be carefully
weighed and should only be used in extreme circumstances.
This section of the Fishing and Recreational Harbours Regulations
can be enforced by enforcement officers at Harbour Authorities, at
the point where the vessel wants to leave the harbour. Unfortunately,
the catch is that the Section cannot be used to enforce payment of
berthage fees while the vessel remains in the harbour.
"29. No person who is the owner or operator of a vessel shall permit
the vessel to leave a harbour until all charges payable in respect of
the vessel have been paid."
Fishing and Recreational Harbours Regulations
The existence of this Section has led some users who are unwilling or
unable to pay fees owed to abandon their vessels. This causes problems
for Harbour Authorities, such as trying to track down owners and
eventually having to bear the expense for removal.
If the harbour user berthage agreement can be worded to include
"storage", Harbour Authorities can act as a "warehouser" and thereby
rely on the Warehouse Lien Act in their province to provide fee
collection options.
Through the act, the Harbour Authority can claim a "lien" on the harbour
user's property "stored" within their facilities for the amount of all
lawful and reasonable charges due. Ultimately, the lien can be exercised
through the sale of goods by public auction.
"Lien: A charge upon real or personal property for the satisfaction
of some debt or duty ordinarily arising by operation of law."
Merriam-Webster dictionary
Unfortunately, there is some uncertainty surrounding the application of
the Warehouse Lien Act to fee collection. On the one hand, there has
been a court decision that seems to indicate that the Act may apply if
incorporated into a berthage agreement. On the other hand, Pacific
Region has received a legal opinion that states that the Warehouse Lien
Act cannot be applied to vessels.
It is worthwhile for Harbour Authorities to become informed of their
rights related to their respective Act.
There is a similar act in most provinces:
| Province | Name of Act |
| British Columbia | Warehouse Lien Act |
| Alberta | Warehousemen's Lien Act |
| Saskatchewan | Warehousemen's Lien |
| Manitoba | The Warehousemen's Liens Act |
| Ontario | Seems to be none |
| Quebec | Seems to be none |
| New Brunswick | Warehouseman's Lien Act |
| Nova Scotia | Warehousemen's Lien Act |
| Prince Edward Island | Warehousemen's Liens Act |
| Newfoundland & Labrador | Warehouser's Lien Act |
| Territory | Name of Act |
| Yukon | Warehouse Keepers Lien Act |
| Northwest Territories | Warehouse Keepers Lien Act |
| Nunavut | Warehouse Keepers Lien Act |
Source:
http://www.canlii.org
It is not allowed to use a fake identity on a letterhead, to claim to be a lawyer or law enforcement officer on the telephone, or to send out notices that may look too much like official court documents.
It is forbidden to maliciously attempt to ruin a delinquent user's reputation by telling others of the debt. Information can be provided to collection agencies, who themselves are guided by strict rules. Collection letters and invoices need to be private and discreet. Harbour Authorities need to avoid exposing themselves to such liabilities.
The use of intimidation or violence to collect (refusing to leave, using abusive language, and threatening violence) is wholly inadvisable. Also, it is not a good idea to make telephone calls too late or too early or too often, in case you are accused of harassment.
This section of the Fishing and Recreational Harbours Act cannot be
used by Harbour Authorities for fee collection, since it only applies to
debts owed to the Crown. Harbour managers, even if they were appointed
as enforcement officers, could not use this section of the Act to
collect unpaid fees, due to the Harbour Authority only having a lease
agreement with the Crown.
"15. Where an enforcement officer believes on reasonable grounds
that:
| Section | Title |
| 9.1 | Berthage Agreements |
| 9.2 | Third Party Payment Agreement |
| 9.3 | Collection and Operational Policies |
| 9.4 | Invoice Letters |
| 9.5 | Notice Letters |
Anonymous Bay Harbour Authority
12345 Anonymous Street, P.O. Box 1234, Anonymous Bay, BC Z0Z 0Z0
Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 e-mail: abc@defgh.com
NON-ASSIGNABLE BERTHAGE AGREEMENT
VESSEL NAME: _________________________ CFV LIC #: _____________
TYPE OF VESSEL:__________________________ LENGTH: ______ metres
LESSEE: _____________________ CONTACT PERSON: _______________
(OWNER NAME)
MAILING ADDRESS:_____________________________________
(NUMBER, STREET CITY PROVINCE)
TELEPHONE: (____)______________ TELEPHONE: (____)_____________
(HOME) (WORK)
EMERGENCY CONTACT: ________________________________________
(NAME AND LOCAL PHONE NUMBER)
Anonymous Bay Harbour Authority (lessor) hereby grants to the
undersigned boat owner, or duly authorized representative, berth and
vessel storage space at the Anonymous Bay Harbour Authority Facility,
for the vessel designated above on the following terms and conditions:
____________________________________
Lessee Anonymous Bay Harbour Authority
Date: ___________Lessee acknowledges having received "General Harbour
Policy" _____
Amended July 2001
Harbour Authority of Anonymous Sea
P.O. Box 00
Anonymous Sea, NL
Z0Z 0Z0
AGREEMENT
FEE STRUCTURE & COLLECTION PROCESS
OF THE
HARBOUR AUTHORITY OF Anonymous Ocean
FEE STRUCTURE
COLLECTION & OPERATIONAL POLICIES -
Mystery Sea Harbour Authority
OPERATIONAL POLICIES
December 7, 2001
Amended September 20, 2000; March 26, 1999
February 24.2001
Amended October 6, 2000 February 24, 2001
Amended September 20, 2000; August 16, 2000 March 14, 2001
Dear Sir or Madam:
RE: Invoice Number_____________, $____________
Reference is made to our correspondence dated ______ and ______,
concerning the above account which is now _____ days past due.
Unless we receive payment in full within 10 days from the date of this
letter, we will have no alternative but to refer this account to the
Provincial Court of Newfoundland, Small Claims Court. Please be governed
accordingly.
Payments should be forwarded to the following address:
Yours truly,
![]()
Please
Pay moorage at Honour Box
or Contact the Harbour Manager
about Moorage
Phone: 000-0000
Cell: 000-0000
Thank you. We appreciate
your cooperation
Phantom Harbour Authority
Box 00
Phantom, BC, Z0Z 0Z0
![]()
Notice letter- Sleepy Marsh Harbour Authority
Sleepy Marsh Harbour Authority
Box 0-0 Sleepy Marsh
Sleepy Marsh, BC, Z0Z 0Z0
November 1, 2003-12-05
REGISTERED LETTER
____________________
____________________
Dear ________________:
Re: Moorage for 30'_____________________
This letter is to advise you that according to our records, moorage has
not been paid for the previous six months. The amount outstanding as of
October 31, 2003 is $1280.00.
The policy of the S.M.H.A. states that:
"notification will be sent out via registered mail to the owner of a
vessel whose moorage is outstanding for six months. The owner is given
90 days to clear the account, plus accrued moorage. Failure to do so
results in the Board possessing the vessel and disposing of it in an
appropriate manner."
Please contact me regarding your intention to promptly clear this
account.
Yours truly,
___________________
President, S.M.H.A.
![]()
Notice letter- No Name Harbour Authority
|
No name Harbour Authority |
Statement |
|||||
|
|
Date |
|||||
|
10/31/2003 |
||||||
|
BILL TO: |
||||||
| AMOUNT DUE |
AMOUNT ENC |
|||||
|
$40.25 |
||||||
|
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
BALANCE |
|||
|
03/31/2003 |
Balance forward |
$40.25 |
||||
|
CURRENT |
1-30 DAYS PAST DUE |
31-60 DAYS PAST DUE |
61-90 DAYS PAST DUE |
OVER 90 DAYS PAST DUE |
AMOUNT DUE |
|
|
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$40.25 |
$40.25 |
|