Symbol of the Government of Canada

SEAS Publication

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Economic Impact of Marine Related Activities in Canada

Table of Content

Acknowledgements
Summary
I Introduction
1. Rationale
2. Purpose and objectives
3. Contents
II Methodology
1. The ocean economy
2. Measuring Impacts7
3. Data
III Economic impacts – private sector
1. Seafood sector
2. Offshore oil & gas sector
3. Water transportation sector
4. Tourism and recreation
5. Marine construction
6. Shipbuilding and repairing and boat building
7. Secondary activities
IV Economic impact – public sector
1. Department of National Defence/Canadian Forces
2. Department of Fisheries and Oceans
3. Other federal departments
4. Provincial/territorial departments/boards
5. Universities and ENGOs
V Economic impact – national & regional
1. National impact
2. Atlantic region impacts
3. Pacific region impacts
4. Arctic region impacts
VI Concluding observations
1. Growth potential
2. Challenges and gaps
3. Emerging issues

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDIX A: Offshore Crude Oil and Natural Gas Value of Output Estimates
APPENDIX B: Water Transportation Sector Output Estimates
APPENDIX C: Tourism and Recreation Expenditures Estimates
APPENDIX D: Marine Construction Expenditures
APPENDIX E: Shipbuilding and Boatbuilding Value of Output
APPENDIX F: Federal and Provincial Government Expenditures
APPENDIX G: Economic impact Multipliers for Marine-related activities
APPENDIX H: Status of Quantifying each Marine Activity

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Gardner Pinfold wishes to thank the many individuals who contributed to the completion of this study.

Sam Baird at Fisheries and Oceans Canada chaired the Steering Committee. To Sam we owe special thanks for his support and guidance on methods and data sources, and also for the many thoughtful comments on report structure and content as the study progressed. Sam also convened a thorough two-day peer review of the report, providing the consultants with insights by leading practitioners in the field of marine economic valuation.

Our gratitude to the members of the Peer Review group, whose observations and advice greatly improved the quality of the report. Thanks to David Pugh (UK), Régis Kalaydjian (France), Jane Harkness (New Zealand), Judith Kildow (USA), Gordon Gislason (Canada), Dan Lane (Canada) and Ken White (Canada).

Thanks to André Jacques at Statistics Canada who provided statistical support and ran the numbers through the Input-Output Model to produce the impact estimates. We also appreciate very much the time and effort of those in federal and provincial government departments and research institutes who delved into their records to provide us with the data we needed.

And finally, we owe special thanks to Alejandro DeMaio-Sukic at Fisheries and Oceans Canada for his on-going support and advice on technical and data matters. Also, Alejandro, with the assistance of Chamari Silva at Fisheries and Oceans, provided an invaluable service by reviewing the final drafts of the report and providing detailed editorial and technical comments.

Any errors and omissions are, of course, the responsibility of the consultants.